How to Find Discontinuities Without a Calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DieCommie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discontinuity
DieCommie
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
How can i find the discontinuitys of \frac{3x+1}{\ x^2+7x-2} without a calculator?

This is an even numbered homework question to which the teacher says he won't help us and there is no answer in the book, plus we are not allowed to use calculators.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hows your history? i believe this problem was solved by the arabs many hundreds of years ago.

hint: you may have to use a square root symbol.
 
Think of when a fraction is left undefined.
 
My history with math is I am very bad at it.

edit- OK I think I just have to use the quadratic formula by hand instead of on a calc so i get exact answers. wow I am stupid :smile:

Thx for the help guys.
 
Last edited:
mathwonk said:
hows your history? i believe this problem was solved by the arabs many hundreds of years ago.

hint: you may have to use a square root symbol.

:smile: nice one mathwonk, i'll save this one for next time :devil:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top