How to find fundamental frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the new fundamental frequency of a sculpture submerged in water, initially vibrating at 250 Hz when hung from a steel wire. The fundamental frequency is determined using the formula that incorporates tension and linear density. When the sculpture is submerged, the tension changes due to the buoyant force, which is calculated using Archimedes' principle. The ratio of the old and new tensions allows for the determination of the new frequency, indicating that the mass of the sculpture is irrelevant in this specific calculation. The final conclusion confirms that the 70 kg mass does not affect the frequency ratio.
ngcg
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When a 70kg aluminum (density = 2.7 g/cm3) sculpture is hung from a steel wire, the fundamental frequency for transverse standing waves on the wire is 250.0 Hz. The sculpture (but not the wire) is then completely submerged in water. What is the new fundamental frequency?


Homework Equations


f=ma
fundamental frequency = (1/2L)((Tensional force/linear density)^1/2)


The Attempt at a Solution


250=(1/2L)((686N/u)^1/2))
(stuck there)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the Archimedes principle, the loss of weight is equal to the weight of the displaced liquid. In the problem the liquid is the water whose density is 1 g/cm^3.
Hence when the sculpture is immersed in water, the new tension is
T' = mg - mg*ρ(w)/ρ(Al)
The frequency is directly proportional to the square root of the tension. Hence
f/f' = sqrt(T/T')
250/f' = sqrt[1/(1 - 1/2.7)]
Now solve for f'.
 
Last edited:
so in this equation, the 70kg value does not matter?

by the way, thanks a lot! :)
 
ngcg said:
so in this equation, the 70kg value does not matter?

by the way, thanks a lot! :)

Since we are taking the ratio of tensions, 70 kg does not matter.
 
thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top