How to find the generator of translation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the generators of translation within the Galilei group, specifically for space and time translations. It is noted that while generators for rotations and Galilean transformations can be easily expressed in matrix form, space translations pose a challenge due to their non-linear nature. A proposed solution involves expanding the 4D space to 5D, where an additional dimension maintains a constant value, allowing for the construction of a matrix representation. The generator for space translations is suggested to be e^{i \hat{p}a/\hbar}, though clarity on the definition of a generator is sought. The conversation concludes with the assertion that a matrix representation can indeed be derived under these conditions.
kakarukeys
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
The Galilei group contains rotations, Galilean transformations, space translation and time translation.

It is easy to work out generators for rotations and Galilean transfromations in matrix form.

And they obey:
[J^i, K^j] = i \epsilon^{ijk}K^k

Can one work out the generator for space translation, P? so that one can show explicitly that:

[K^i, P^j] = 0

and same for time translation.
[K^i, H] = i P^i

OR

there is no matrix form for these two generators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody else has taken a shot at this, so I'll put my $.02 in, though I'm afraid I can't give you as definite an answer as you'd like (well, for that matter, as I'd like).

Usual matrix notation is linear, so you can write down (x,y) -> ax + by in matrix form. However, you want to write a transform of the form x -> x+a. This isn't a linear tranform. It appears to me that you can do this by just defining a "variable" that's equal to a constant. To avoid winding up with non-square matrices, you'll have to add a dummy line, that describes how a constant transforms. Well, a constant is always equal to itself, it doesn't depend on the other variables, so the matrix entry for how a constant transforms will have to say that it's equal to 1 x itself, no other variable affects it.
 
Isn't the generator for space translations e^{i \hat{p}a/\hbar}? Or is a generator something different?
 
I do not quite understand what you said.
But I found the answer.
The matrix can be found by expanding the 4D space to 5D, provided that x_5 is always 1.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top