How to find the integral of e^(sqrt(x)) as x goes from 0 to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter ricekrispie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of e^(sqrt(x)) from 0 to 1 requires the use of substitution and integration by parts. The recommended substitution is u = sqrt(x), which simplifies the integral to 2∫te^t dt. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of integration by parts to solve the integral, as simple substitutions alone are insufficient. Participants collaborated to clarify the steps and ensure the correct application of techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in calculus.
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice integration by parts with various functions.
  • Explore advanced substitution techniques in calculus.
  • Learn how to apply exponential function properties in integrals.
  • Study LaTeX formatting for clearer mathematical presentations.
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, educators teaching integration techniques, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in mathematical analysis.

ricekrispie
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



\int_0^1 e ^(sqrt. x) dx


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i don´t know what to let u equal to... maybe sqrt.x? but what good would that do when u is differentiated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, your latek messed up

\int_{0}^{1} e^{\sqrt{x}}dx

yes?
 
yes, thanks... i´m still figuring out how to use it :smile:
 
Let u=\sqrt{x}

then, use another "simple" substitution so that you only have 1 variable.

then, you will need to use integration by parts.
 
i still haven´t figured the problem itself though...
 
ricekrispie said:
yes, thanks... i´m still figuring out how to use it :smile:
shoot, at least you've already almost got it down. there are ppl with like 500+ posts and still don't use latek, hurts my eyes :p
 
that was before learning integration by parts so i guess i´m not supposed to use it
 
ricekrispie said:
that was before learning integration by parts so i guess i´m not supposed to use it
what technique are you not allowed to use?
 
rocophysics said:
Let u=\sqrt{x}

then, use another "simple" substitution so that you only have 1 variable.

then, you will need to use integration by parts.

integration by parts... that's why i´m stuck
 
  • #10
there's no way around this problem without the use of integration by parts, want to work this problem together by use of parts?
 
  • #11
do i let u = e^\sqrt{x} ?
 
  • #12
the derivative of your substitution would then become

u=e^{\sqrt{x}}

du=\frac{e^{\sqrt{x}}}{2\sqrt{x}}dx

messy. then you will need to take the ln of your u-substitution so you can get your problem in terms of 1 variable.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
so then u is just \sqrt{x} ?
 
  • #14
ricekrispie said:
so then u is just \sqrt{x} ?
yes and i can help you through integration by parts, b/c we can't integrate this problem by simple substitutions.
 
  • #15
ok... u = \sqrt{x}
and du = du=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}dx
 
  • #16
what would dv be?
 
  • #17
well first, let's make it a "t-substitution" b/c we'll need to use U and V for parts.

so

dx=2\sqrt{x}dt

now we need our integration in terms of 1 variable, so

t=\sqrt{x}

thus

\int e^{\sqrt{x}}dx \rightarrow 2\int te^{t}dt

now we do integration by parts.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
ricekrispie said:
what would dv be?
no, the last step was a simple substitution ... this next step we will use parts.
 
  • #19
wait.. i´m confused... now i have \sqrt{x} as u
and then i have to square it?
 
Last edited:
  • #20
2\int te^{t}dt

\begin{array}{cc}u=t & dV=e^{t}dt \\ du=dt & V=e^{t}\end{array}

i'm sure you can take it from here! (judging from your other post)
 
  • #21
omg i´m sorry hehe
where did u get the t from?
 
  • #22
oh my god.. nevermind... i got it
 
  • #23
i didn´t read your other post! thankss hehehe :smile:
 
  • #24
ricekrispie said:
i didn´t read your other post! thankss hehehe :smile:
i just updated it again, idk why i squared it. lol sorry, it's not supposed to be squared.

at times you will need to square it, but not in this situation. (you could, but you'll get the same result which is a waste of time)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K