Undergrad How to find the matrix of the derivative endomorphism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the matrix representation of the derivative endomorphism using the basis B=(1, X, X^2, X^3) for R3[X]. The initial matrix A for the first derivative is correctly identified, but confusion arises when calculating the derivative of the polynomial P=X^3+X^2+X+1, leading to incorrect results. A suggestion is made to reorder the polynomial to P=1+X+X^2+X^3, which aligns with the basis and yields the correct derivative when multiplied by the transformation matrix. Additionally, an alternative basis is proposed that simplifies the matrix to a "Jordan form," highlighting a broader theorem about linear transformations and their matrix representations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of basis order in matrix calculations for derivatives.
Cathr
Messages
67
Reaction score
3
We have ##B=(1, X, X^2, X^3)## as a base of ##R3 [X]## and we have the endomorphisms ##d/dX## and ##d^2/dX^2## so that:

##d/dX (P) = P'## and ##d^2/dX^2 (P) = P''##.

Calculating the matrix in class, the teacher found the following matrix, call it ##A##:
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 2 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}

This is the matrix for the first derivative, and it has the right property that when it's multiplied with itself, it gives the matrix of the second derivative:
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 2 & 0 \\

0 & 0 & 0 & 6 \\

0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}

However, when I try to calculate the derivative of a polynomial, say ##P=X^3+ X^2 + X + 1##, I don't find the right answer.
I found that the transpose ##C## of the matrix ##A## works, so that if we multiply ##P## with the following matrix:\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 2 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
\end{bmatrix} *

I find ##P= 3X^2 + 2X +1##, which is the derivative.

However, this doesn't work for all vectors and, multiplied by itself, it doesn't give the matrix of the second derivative, so it's still wrong.

May you please give me a hint on finding the solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You write the basis in the order ##B=\{1,X,X^2,X^3\}##, but then you write the polynomial in the order ##P=X^3+X^2+X+1##, which indicates that you take the basis elements in the opposite order. I think this is the cause of the confusion, since the transformation matrix depends on the order of the basis elements. If we write ##P=1+X+X^2+X^3## and differentiate by multiplying the transformation matrix by the coordinate vector, you obtain the correct result ##P'=1+2X+3X^2##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD
an even nicer basis is obtained by tweaking this one a little to {1, X, X^2/2!, X^3/3!}. Then the non zero entries are all = 1, and the matrix for D is in "Jordan form". The operator (D-c) acting on the similar space {e^ct, te^ct, t^2/2! e^ct, t^3.3! e^ct} has a similar matrix, but also with the constant c on the diagonal. The amazing theorem is that this is, up to "similarity", the most general possible matrix! I.e., given any linear transformation at all on a finite dimensional space, as long as the roots of its characteristic polynomial all lie in the scalar field, then in some basis it has a matrix made up of copies of blocks like this.

So in some sense every linear transformation looks like copies of the derivative operator (D-c) acting on the solution space of the differential equation (D-c)^n = 0. This is discussed in my free linear algebra notes:

http://alpha.math.uga.edu/%7Eroy/laprimexp.pdf
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K