How to find torque on planet carrier

AI Thread Summary
To find the torque on the planet carrier in an epicyclic gear train, first clarify that the ring and sun gears are inputs while the carrier is the output. A power balance approach is suggested, where power out equals power in, adjusted for efficiency. The calculated power for the sun and ring gears is 160 kW and 285 kW, respectively. Two potential torque values for the carrier emerge from the energy flow analysis: 231.17 Nm when summing the powers and 64.93 Nm when taking the difference. The direction of torque remains a critical factor in determining the correct value.
csiddharthn
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have the following data in an epicyclic gear train:

Angular speed on ring = 1500 rpm, teeth on ring = 30
Angular speed on sun = 3200 rpm, teeth on sun = 10
Angular speed on carrier = 1925 rpm, teeth on planets = 10

(The ratios of teeth are for simple calculation assumed 3: 1: 1 among ring, sun and carrier.)

Now,

torque on ring = 190 Nm
torque on sun = 50 Nm

How do I find the torque on the planet carrier?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Csidd,

A question for you; when you mention that there are torques on the ring and sun gears, does this mean that they are the two inputs to the system and that the carrier is the output? If so I think you can use a power balance. Ideally, power out = power in. Not ideally, power out = efficiency*power in. Also, can you specify the directions of the rotations?
 
I have not checked your gear ratios and relative RPMs.
Analyse the energy flow per minute.
power = rpm * torque

Wsun = 3200 * 50 = 160 k
Wring = 1500 * 190 = 285 k

The problem is that we do not know the direction of the torque.

There are two possible solutions.
The sum = 445 k
445 k / 1925 = 231. 169 Nm

The difference = 125 k
125 k / 1925 = 64.93 Nm
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top