How to find weight moving from the Earth's core up?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garretg06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Weight
AI Thread Summary
To determine weight while moving from the Earth's core to a distance of 3RE above the surface, the gravitational force equation, F = G*m1*m2/d^2, is essential. As the individual approaches the center of the Earth, weight decreases to zero due to the uniform distribution of mass surrounding them. The gravitational field inside a uniform spherical shell is zero, while outside it behaves as if all mass is concentrated at the center. The inverse square law indicates that weight will change based on distance from the Earth's center. Understanding these principles will aid in plotting weight versus time accurately during the elevator ride.
Garretg06
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine standing on a scale and riding in an elevator at constant speed in a radial direction from the center of the Earth to a distance 3RE above the surface- I'm supposed to plot weight vs time so what I'm looking for an equation(s) I can use to find weight.

*Assuming uniform desnity


Homework Equations


Forcegrav=G*m1*m2/d^2
Earth Radius= 6378100 meters
Weight=mass*forcegravity
*the Inverse square law 1/r^2 I think this may come into play

The Attempt at a Solution


I can find the force form gravity but I'm having a hard time deciding if I need to incorporate /how find out the decreasing mass of the Earth as I (the individual) move to the center of the Earth.
I know that at the center of the Earth the weight is 0 because the mass of the Earth is surrounding "me" and is evenly distributed...but other than that I am stuck. Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Garretg06 said:
I know that at the center of the Earth the weight is 0 because the mass of the Earth is surrounding "me" and is evenly distributed...but other than that I am stuck. Help?
Do you know what the net field is inside a uniform spherical shell (whether it be a gravitational field or electrostatic field)?
 
I think it is supposed to be the gravitational field but I'm not sure how to calculate it.
 
Garretg06 said:
I think it is supposed to be the gravitational field but I'm not sure how to calculate it.
Standard result you should know:
If a force field follows an inverse square law and the source of the field is uniformly distributed over a spherical shell then;
- the field outside the shell is independent of the radius of the shell, i.e. it is the same as if all the source (charge, mass, whatever) were concentrated at the sphere's centre;
- the field inside the shell is zero.
I don't know whether you are expected to prove this or know it. It is not trivial to prove, but not toweringly difficult either. You should be able to find a proof on the net.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top