How to Find X: Simple Steps for Solving Conversion Problems | Lowgear

  • Thread starter Thread starter lowgear
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 1.3*((X*10)^.625/(X+10)^.25) = 11.9626, one approach is to raise the equation to the 8th power and manipulate it to form a polynomial. After simplifying and combining like terms, the solution for X can be found using computational tools like Maple, which yields X ≈ 11.99997853. Rounding the constants suggests that the intended solution is approximately 12. The discussion emphasizes the importance of algebraic manipulation and the use of software for complex calculations.
lowgear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I haven't done this type of math for too many years to remember. I use math daily in my work, but for the life of me I can't seem to figure out how to do this conversion. Could someone please help, I will be very grateful.
Thanks
lowgear

1.3*((X*10)^.625/(X+10)^.25) = 11.9626


I need to know how to find X
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would start by taking the equation to the 8th power then multiplying both sides by the left side's denominator then combining like terms to get you a polynomial of integer powers.
 
Maple gives X = 11.99997853

If you rounded off some of the constants, then I think you were going for a solution of 12.
 

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Unit Conversions of Force: How to Convert Between Different Units of Force?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Solve for X: Formula Conversion Math Problem
Replies
1
Views
6K
B Creating Log Tables: Briggs' 400-Year-Old Accomplishment
Replies
10
Views
2K
MHB Help Solving an Equation: Step by Step Guide
Replies
6
Views
3K
MHB Rearranging Formula, making x the subject from y=5(x+3)
Replies
12
Views
3K
MHB Solving a Primary Math Problem: Find the Areas of A & C
Replies
10
Views
2K
MHB How to solve sqrt(x + 15) + sqrt(x) = 15 ?
Replies
11
Views
19K
MHB How can the residual capitalization problem be solved with three factors?
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Second week precal, x^1/2 + 3x^−1/2 = 54x^−3/2
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB Solving a Polynomial x^6 – 7x^3 + 12 by Factoring.
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top