How to Formulate Sets and Equivalence Classes in Set Theory Notation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on formulating sets and equivalence classes in set theory notation, specifically addressing the set A defined as A = {(x,x) | x ∈ ℝ₀⁺} for non-negative real numbers. It clarifies that the equivalence relation R is defined by (x₁, y₁) R (x₂, y₂) if x₁² + y₁² = x₂² + y₂², indicating that the equivalence classes correspond to circles centered at (0,0). The formal notation for the equivalence class of (x,y) is given as [x,y] = {(x',y') | x'² + y'² = x² + y²}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory notation
  • Familiarity with equivalence relations
  • Knowledge of real numbers and their properties
  • Basic mathematical logic and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of equivalence relations in depth
  • Learn about different types of sets in set theory
  • Explore the concept of Cartesian products in set notation
  • Investigate the applications of equivalence classes in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of set theory and equivalence relations.

jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
How do you write in proper set theoretic notation that
a set A = (x,x) where x is a non-negative real number?

Also, (x_1, y_1) R (x_2, y_2) if x_1 ^2 + y_1 ^2 = x_2 ^2 + y_2 ^2
The equiv. classes are circles at (0,0), right?
How do you write this formally (using set theoretic notation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's clear from the context that you're working in the real numbers with the standard ordering, then you'd probably write [tex]A=\{(x,x)|x>0\}[/tex]. Otherwise, you'd usually write either [tex]A=\{(x,x)|x\in\mathbb{R}^+_0\}[/tex] or [tex]A=\{(x,x)|x\in[0,\infty)\}[/tex], although these are by no means the only conventions.

In general, to define a set using set notation, you need to specify (a) a collection of variables, (b) what condition those variables must satisfy, and (c) how the variables are combined to make an object in the overall set. In other words, a set S is given in set notation by
[tex]S=\{L(x_1,x_2,\ldots)|Q(x_1,x_2,\ldots)\}[/tex]​
where Q is some condition (e.g. the condition that [tex]x_1[/tex] is a blue ball, [tex]x_2[/tex] is a real number, and all the other variables are stars in the Andromeda galaxy) and L specifies a way of combining variables.
 
jaejoon89 said:
Also, (x_1, y_1) R (x_2, y_2) if x_1 ^2 + y_1 ^2 = x_2 ^2 + y_2 ^2
The equiv. classes are circles at (0,0), right?
How do you write this formally (using set theoretic notation)?

Yes, they are. Formally, the equivalence class [x,y] of (x,y) is
[tex][x,y]=\left\{(x',y')|x'^2+y'^2=x^2+y^2\right\}.[/tex]​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K