How to Formulate Sets and Equivalence Classes in Set Theory Notation?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
How do you write in proper set theoretic notation that
a set A = (x,x) where x is a non-negative real number?

Also, (x_1, y_1) R (x_2, y_2) if x_1 ^2 + y_1 ^2 = x_2 ^2 + y_2 ^2
The equiv. classes are circles at (0,0), right?
How do you write this formally (using set theoretic notation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's clear from the context that you're working in the real numbers with the standard ordering, then you'd probably write [tex]A=\{(x,x)|x>0\}[/tex]. Otherwise, you'd usually write either [tex]A=\{(x,x)|x\in\mathbb{R}^+_0\}[/tex] or [tex]A=\{(x,x)|x\in[0,\infty)\}[/tex], although these are by no means the only conventions.

In general, to define a set using set notation, you need to specify (a) a collection of variables, (b) what condition those variables must satisfy, and (c) how the variables are combined to make an object in the overall set. In other words, a set S is given in set notation by
[tex]S=\{L(x_1,x_2,\ldots)|Q(x_1,x_2,\ldots)\}[/tex]​
where Q is some condition (e.g. the condition that [tex]x_1[/tex] is a blue ball, [tex]x_2[/tex] is a real number, and all the other variables are stars in the Andromeda galaxy) and L specifies a way of combining variables.
 
jaejoon89 said:
Also, (x_1, y_1) R (x_2, y_2) if x_1 ^2 + y_1 ^2 = x_2 ^2 + y_2 ^2
The equiv. classes are circles at (0,0), right?
How do you write this formally (using set theoretic notation)?

Yes, they are. Formally, the equivalence class [x,y] of (x,y) is
[tex][x,y]=\left\{(x',y')|x'^2+y'^2=x^2+y^2\right\}.[/tex]​