How to Identify Constructive Interference in Young's Double Slit Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
In Young's double slit experiment, constructive interference occurs when two waves are in phase, resulting in bright fringes on the viewing screen. To identify these points, one must measure the distance between the slits, the distance to the screen, and the wavelength of the light used. The fringe distance can then be calculated, allowing for the marking of total constructive interference locations, labeled with order numbers m = 0, ±1, ±2, etc. The areas of total destructive interference, where waves cancel each other out, are characterized by the absence of wave motion. Understanding these principles enables accurate identification of interference patterns in the experiment.
nophun6
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
My question deals with Young's double slit experiment.
double.jpg

This figure is a graphical representation of Young’s double slit experiment in which laser light passing through a pair of closely spaced slits results in a 2-source interference pattern. The laser light, incident from the top, is diffracted as it passes through each slit (indicated by A) resulting in an interference pattern which is projected onto a viewing screen (B) which reflects the incident light. On the figure below, carefully mark the locations of
total constructive interference on the viewing screen and describe how it
would look to your eye. Label the order number,
m = 0,±1,±2,K, for each total constructive interference location on the screen.

Ok, so constructive interference occurse when the two waves are in phase at a point. I also know that when the light from the two slits arrives at a point on the screen and constructive interference occurs at that point, a bright fringe appears. How do I know where to mark the points of constructive interference? and how do i know which order number it is?
thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The grey "rays" are regions where the two waves cancel each other out. One do not observe any wave motion in these areas. These rays are thus the regions were total deconstructive interference are taking place. In the regions in between these one observes wave motion - the two wavefronts interference constructively in these regions.
 
by 1st finding the distance between the two slits ,distance between the slits and the mirror,and wavelenght you now can find the fringe distance hence measuring from the the centrl max you can now note the 1st bright fringe to appear 'bright fringe mens a constructive zone'
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top