How to interpret a Free Body Diagram for a Kite in Flight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on interpreting a Free Body Diagram for a kite in flight, specifically addressing the forces acting on the kite, such as a 48 N wind force and a 24° angle of the kite's tail. There is confusion regarding the problem's wording and the relationship between the angle of the kite, the point of attachment of the string, and the lift-to-drag ratio. The angle of the string can vary significantly based on these factors, with the tail's material affecting its orientation in the wind. Clarification is sought on the exact wording of the question and any accompanying diagrams to better understand the problem. Accurate interpretation of these elements is essential for solving the problem effectively.
joedozzi
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The wind is blowing with a force of 48 N against a kite that Taylor is flying, so that
the tail of the kite makes an angle of 24° to the ground.

I am just really confused on this, I attacted the solution would anyone mind explaining it? I have no idea on how to get this



attachment.php?attachmentid=55395&stc=1&d=1360090056.jpg
 

Attachments

  • free body diagram.jpg
    free body diagram.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 1,598
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem is poorly worded. The angle of the kite depends on the effective point of attachment of the string, which is usually located above the center of lift for stability and causes the angle of the kite to be tilted a bit forward of being perpendicular to the string.

The angle of the string is related to the lift versus drag of the kite (plus drag of the string) and can be nearly vertical if the lift to drag ratio is very high.

The tail of a kite is usualy a flexible material. If the tail is very light, it will be blown nearly horizontal to the ground. If the tail is a thin piece of string with a weight attached to the end of the tail, it will remain nearly vertical to the ground.
 
What is the exact wording of the question?

Edit: I deleted my reply because I think it was rubbish! I think we need the exact wording of the question and any diagrams provided.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top