How do I determine the y values for the tail of a vector function plot?

AI Thread Summary
To plot the vector function F(x,y) = i + cos(x)j, it’s important to understand that the i component remains constant at 1, while the j component varies based on the cosine of x. When x is set to specific values like 0, π/4, and π/2, the corresponding j values are 1, 1/√2, and 0, respectively. The tail of the vector can be placed at any y value since the output does not depend on y; thus, for any x, y can be any real number. This results in multiple vectors at the same x position but different y values, leading to a sinusoidal shape in the plot.
bksree
Messages
75
Reaction score
2
Hi
How do I plot this vector function
F(x,y) = i + cos x j where i and j are unit vectors
Spose I take
x = 0, then the components in i and y direction are 1, 1
x = pi/4, then " " 1, 1/sq rt 2
x = pi/2 " " 1, 0

This doesn't look corect

TIA
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's how you plot it. Remember that, if the function F is defined in terms of Cartesian coordinates, x just means the x coordinate, not the angle of the point from the x-axis.
 

Attachments

  • {1,Cos[x]}.jpg
    {1,Cos[x]}.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 560
Thabk you
My doubt is as follows :
When x = 0, the comp ibn i direction is 1 and in j dirn is 1
When x= pi/4 = 0.78, the comp in i dirn is 1 and in j is 1/sq rt 2
When x= 3pi/4 = 2.36, the comp in i dirn is 1 and in j is -1/sq rt 2
When x = pi/2 = 1.57, the comp in i dirn is 1 and in j is 0, and so on

But here the comp in i dirn is always 1 while j is varying.

How then do you get the sinusoidal shape ?

TIA
 
I'm not sure I get what your doubt is. Could you say what you expect it to look like?
 
Thank you for the reply.
My question is : How do I plot this vector function manually

F(x,y) = i + cos x j where i and j are unit vectors
Spose I take
(i) When x = 0, the comp in i direction is 1 and in j dirn is 1
(ii) When x= pi/4 = 0.78, the comp in i dirn is 1 and in j is 0.707
(iii) When x = pi/2 = 1.57, the comp in i dirn is 1 and in j is 0
(iv) When x= 3pi/4 = 2.36, the comp in i dirn is 1 and in j is -0.707
and so on
To plot, I have to locate the tail of vector and draw the arrow in the direction given by the i and j components.
eg. in (i) the x for the tail is 0 and dirn is given by 1 and 1
(ii) the x for the tail is 0.78, dirn is given by 1 and 0.707
But what are the y values of the tail in these cases ?

TIA
 
bksree said:
To plot, I have to locate the tail of vector and draw the arrow in the direction given by the i and j components.
eg. in (i) the x for the tail is 0 and dirn is given by 1 and 1
(ii) the x for the tail is 0.78, dirn is given by 1 and 0.707
But what are the y values of the tail in these cases ?

Okay, take the vector (1,1). When x = 0, we can calculate that F(x,y) = (1,1). But this is true for all values of y. If you look at the plot I posted, you'll see that all the vectors along the vertical line where x =0 are identical. That's because the output doesn't depend on the value of y. So if you're asking where is the tail of the vector (1,1) = i + j, such that x = 0, there's no one, unique answer: y can equal any real number. Likewise, when F(x,y) = (1,0,707), y can take any value.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top