How to prove by mathematical induction?

James2
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
How do I prove a formula/rule or something by mathematical induction? Please give me a few examples or resources and explain it as best you can because I think I'm messing up some how.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What are you not getting, exactly? If you just don't know what induction is, surely a google search would be faster than starting a new thread.
 
Everything I read confuses me, it tells me to do something different everytime...
 
James2 said:
Everything I read confuses me, it tells me to do something different everytime...

We can't help you if you don't explain what's confusing you. Try posting your attempt at solving an induction problem and explain where you get stuck.
 
I have an equation, (5n + 2) = 2[(5/2)n + 1] I know this is true from the basis step. Then I asume n = k now I must prove n = k + 1. So, (5k + 2) = 2[(5/2)k + 1]

Alright then, I try to substitute k + 1 in and add it or something so I get... 2[(5/2)k + 1] + [5(k + 1) + 2] = 2 [(5/2)(k + 1) + 1]

Simplifying, I get 10k + 2 + 5k + 5 + 2 = 10(k + 1) + 2

And finallly, 15k + 9 =/= 10k + 12

SO... whaaaat? What happened here?
 
(5n + 2) = 2[(5/2)n + 1]

n = 0:
5*0 + 2 = 2[(5/2)*0 + 1]

The case is true for 0.

Suppose the case is true for n = k.
Now we can use (5k + 2) = 2[(5/2)k + 1].

n = k + 1:
5(k + 1) + 2 = (5k + 2) + 5 = 2[(5/2)k + 1] + 5 = 2[(5/2)k + 1 + 5/2] = 2[(5/2)(k+1) + 1]

The case n = k + 1 follows from the case n = k.
With case n = 0 true the equation therefore works for all non-negative integers.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top