How to Prove E[Y|F0]=Y When Y is F0-Measurable?

umutk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need help about conditional expectation for my research. I get stucked on this point. Could anyone show me how to prove that:
"Let E[|Y|]<∞. By checking that Definition is satisfied, show that if Y is measurable F0, then E[Y|F0]=Y."

Def: Let Y be a random variable defined on an underlying probability space(\Omega,F,P) and satisfying E[|Y|]<∞. Let F0 be a sub-\sigma-algebra of F. The conditional expected value of Y given F0,denoted E[Y|F0],is an F0-measurable random variable that also satisfies:E[IFY]=E[IFE[Y|F0]] for all F \in F0

Note that: Red Fs are sets, but black Fs are sigma-algebras.

I appreciate any response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody??
 
Welcome to PF.
Are you really trying to tell us that is research? To me it sounds like an exercise from a measure theoretic probability course.
I suggest you show what you have tried so far or look up the answer in a textbook.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top