MHB How to Prove Stirling Numbers of the First Kind for s(n,3)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alyafey22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Stirling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the formula for Stirling numbers of the first kind, specifically for s(n,3), expressed as $$s(n,3)=\frac{1}{2}(-1)^{n-1}(n-1)!\left(H_{n-1}^2-H_{n-1}^{(2)}\right)$$. Participants suggest starting with unsigned Stirling numbers and using induction to prove the identity. Key identities include $$\left[{n\atop 3}\right] = \left[{n-1\atop 2}\right] + (n-1)\times \left[{n-1\atop 3}\right]$$ and $$\left[{n\atop 2}\right] = (n-1)! \times H_{n-1}$$, which simplifies the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stirling numbers of the first kind
  • Familiarity with harmonic numbers, specifically $$H_k^{(n)}$$
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction techniques
  • Basic combinatorial interpretations of permutations and cycles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Stirling numbers of the first kind
  • Learn about harmonic numbers and their significance in combinatorial mathematics
  • Explore mathematical induction in depth, particularly in combinatorial proofs
  • Investigate the combinatorial interpretations of permutations and cycle structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying combinatorics, and anyone interested in advanced number theory and its applications in permutations and cycles.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
HI folks , working on Stirling nums , how to prove ?

$$s(n,3)=\frac{1}{2}(-1)^{n-1}(n-1)!\left(H_{n-1}^2-H_{n-1}^{(2)}\right)
$$

where we define $$H_k^{(n)}= \sum_{m=1}^k \frac{1}{m^n}$$

I don't how to start (Bandit)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, let us forget about the sign and work with unsigned Stirling numbers (so on the left you'd have $\left[{n\atop 3}\right]$, and on the right the same except that the factor $(-1)^{n-1}$ vanishes) . The result then will follow immediately.

Now, we have $\left[{n\atop 3}\right] = \left[{n-1\atop 2}\right] + (n-1)\times \left[{n-1\atop 3}\right]$

And here note that $\left[{n\atop 2}\right] = (n-1)! \times H_{n-1}$, a simpler identity. $(*)$

Having the identities above, try proving your identity (in an unsigned version) by induction. Don't forget that you have $H_n^2 = \left(H_{n-1}+1/n\right)^2$ and $H_n^{(2)} = H_{n-1}^{(2)} + 1/n^2$.

$(*)$ This one has a nicer combinatorial intepretation. First remember that $\left[{n\atop k}\right]$ counts the number of permutations having exactly $k$ cycles in its disjoint cycle decomposition.
Now $(n-1)\times H_{n-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \frac{(n-1)!}{k}$. Here interpret $(n-1)!$ as taking the permutations that fix $n$. Then, for each $k$, let $\pi_1,\ldots,\pi_{n-1},\pi_n=n$ translate into having the cycles $\pi_1\to \ldots \pi_k\to \pi_1$ and $\pi_{k+1}\to \ldots \to \pi_n\to \pi_{k+1}$. Here note that we are overcounting $k$ times (since $\pi_1,\ldots,\pi_k$ ; $\pi_2,\ldots,\pi_k,\pi_1$ ; ... ; $\pi_k,\pi_1,\ldots,\pi_{k-1}$ result int he same cycle structure, we don't have the same problem with the other cycle since $n$ is fixed), hence the division by $k$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K