How to Prove the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by a Recursive Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of a sequence defined recursively by \( a_1 = \sin x \) and \( a_{n+1} = \sin a_n \). Participants are exploring the properties of the sine function and its implications for the boundedness and monotonicity of the sequence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the boundedness of the sequence and its potential to be non-increasing. Questions arise regarding the validity of the initial assumptions and the need for rigorous proof of monotonicity.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the properties of the sine function and its relationship to the sequence. Some participants have attempted to prove certain inequalities, while others express uncertainty about the necessity of formal proofs. The discussion reflects a mix of approaches and interpretations, with no clear consensus yet on the correct method to establish convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints related to the nature of the sine function and its behavior near zero. There is also a reference to the limitations of using derivative methods for proving monotonicity in this context.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
[tex]a_1=\sin x[/tex]
[tex]-\infty<x<\infty[/tex]
[tex]a_{n+1}=\sin a_n[/tex]

prove that [tex]a_n[/tex] convergent and find

[tex]\lim _{n->\infty}a_n=?[/tex]
the solution that i saw is that because
[tex]a_1=\sin x[/tex] then its bounded from 1 to -1

so

|[tex]a_{n+1}[/tex]|<|[tex]\sin a_n[/tex]|=<|[tex]a_n[/tex]|

so its non increasing and it goes to 0.

but the teacher says that its not a proof
why its not a proof
how to solve it correctly??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi transgalactic! :smile:
transgalactic said:
the solution that i saw is that because
[tex]a_1=\sin x[/tex] then its bounded from 1 to -1

so

|[tex]a_{n+1}[/tex]|<|[tex]\sin a_n[/tex]|=<|[tex]a_n[/tex]|

so its non increasing and it goes to 0.

but the teacher says that its not a proof
why its not a proof

Because you haven't proved it's non increasing …

and even when you do, you'll need to prove it doesn't decrease to a limit > 0 :wink:
 
yes i did
i showed the inequality and i written about the property of sinus

what else do i need to write??
 
transgalactic said:
i showed the inequality …

no … you only wrote it :rolleyes:

how would you prove it? :smile:
 
i don't need to prove the inequality its obvious

no matter what number i will put into x its sinx will be from 1 to -1
and there is a theorem for which sin x and x have approximately the same value near 0

and i put absolute value because we can't look at it from - infinity too

how to prove this inequality
??
 
transgalactic said:
i don't need to prove the inequality its obvious

he he he :smile:

it isn't obvious!
no matter what number i will put into x its sinx will be from 1 to -1

irrelevant!
and there is a theorem for which sin x and x have approximately the same value near 0

how does that help?

you need to prove that sinx is smaller than x
 
ok
i prove that sinx <x
f(x)=sinx-x
f'(x)=cosx-1
so for all x that differs 0 f'(x)<0 so f(x) is decreasing
f(0)=0
so on x=0 its 0 and decreasing
so f(x) <0 everywhere except x=0
so sin<x
what next
??
 
transgalactic said:
ok
i prove that sinx <x
f(x)=sinx-x
f'(x)=cosx-1
so for all x that differs 0 f'(x)<0 so f(x) is decreasing
f(0)=0
so on x=0 its 0 and decreasing
so f(x) <0 everywhere except x=0
so sin<x
what next
??

messy, but correct :approve:

ok, now it easily follows that an is decreasing …

but you still need to prove that it decreases to 0, and not to some number > 0 :smile:
 
[tex] a_{n+1}=\sin a_n [/tex]
a1=sin x where -infinity<x<+infinity

i don't know how to prove that its decreasing
i can't use the function method that i used before with derivatives and stuff

i can only say an observation
??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K