How to Prove the Existence of a Cycle Subgraph for k-Connected Graphs?

  • Thread starter andreass
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Graph
In summary, a subgraph of a k-connected graph is a smaller graph formed by selecting a subset of vertices and edges from the original graph. Studying subgraphs is important for understanding connectivity properties and can help in solving problems related to network reliability. The connectivity of a subgraph is always equal to or less than the connectivity of the original graph. A subgraph can be disconnected if the removed edges and vertices disconnect the remaining vertices, and the minimum number of vertices needed to disconnect a subgraph is equal to its vertex connectivity.
  • #1
andreass
16
0
How to prove that for every k-connected graph (k>=2) with at least 2*k vertices, there exists subgraph, which is cycle with at least 2*k vertices?
Ok, it’s obvious for k=2. It looks something like cycle with or without some other edges:
path3906.png


But I've no ideas how to prove it for k>2
Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Yes, it's the same.
But in my opinion "better" definition is:
Graph is k-connected if and only if it contains k internally disjoint paths between any two vertices
 

What is a subgraph of a k-connected graph?

A subgraph of a k-connected graph is a smaller graph that is formed by selecting a subset of vertices and edges from the original k-connected graph. This means that all the selected vertices and edges must be present in the original graph, but there may be additional vertices and edges in the original graph that are not included in the subgraph.

What is the importance of studying subgraphs of k-connected graphs?

Studying subgraphs of k-connected graphs is important for understanding the connectivity properties of a graph. It allows us to analyze the structure of a graph in more detail and identify important substructures that may have special properties. This can also help in solving problems related to network reliability and robustness.

What is the relationship between the connectivity of a subgraph and the connectivity of the original k-connected graph?

The connectivity of a subgraph is always equal to or less than the connectivity of the original k-connected graph. This is because a subgraph is formed by removing some edges and vertices from the original graph, which can only reduce its connectivity. However, in some cases, the subgraph may still be k-connected if the removed edges and vertices do not disconnect the remaining vertices.

Can a subgraph of a k-connected graph be disconnected?

Yes, a subgraph of a k-connected graph can be disconnected if the removed edges and vertices disconnect the remaining vertices. In this case, the subgraph will have a lower connectivity than the original k-connected graph.

How do you find the minimum number of vertices that need to be removed to disconnect a subgraph of a k-connected graph?

To find the minimum number of vertices that need to be removed to disconnect a subgraph of a k-connected graph, you can use the concept of vertex connectivity. Vertex connectivity is the minimum number of vertices that need to be removed to disconnect a graph. Therefore, the minimum number of vertices that need to be removed to disconnect a subgraph is equal to the vertex connectivity of the subgraph.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top