How to prove this statement about the derivative of a function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving a statement about the derivative of a function using the chain rule. The initial approach involves differentiating \( r^2 \) with respect to \( r \) and relating it to changes in \( p \). Participants clarify that the goal is to show that \( f(r) \) is a linear function, specifically \( f(r) = r + C \), and that this can be approached as a simple differential equation. There is also a query about the relationship between differentials with respect to \( r \) and \( \theta \), which is resolved by referencing the chain rule. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in mathematical notation and definitions to aid understanding.
oliverkahn
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
To prove: ##\dfrac{d[f(r)]}{dr}=## constant
Relevant Equations
Given (1): ##r=\sqrt{a^2 + p^2 - 2 ap \cos \theta}##

where ##a,p,\theta## are independent

Given (2): ##\dfrac{d[f(a+p)]}{dp}=\dfrac{d[f(a-p)]}{dp}##
My try:

##\begin{align}
\dfrac{d {r^2}}{d r} \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial p} = \dfrac{\partial {r^2}}{\partial p} \tag1\\
\dfrac{\partial r}{\partial p} = \dfrac{\partial {r^2}}{\partial p} \dfrac{1}{\dfrac{d r^2}{d r}}=\dfrac{p-a\cos\theta}{r} \tag2\\
\end{align}##

By chain rule:

##\dfrac{\partial [f(r)]}{\partial p}=\dfrac{d [f(r)]}{d r} \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial p} = \dfrac{d [f(r)]}{d r} \dfrac{p-a\cos\theta}{r}##

If it is the right approach, please complete the proof.

I do not even know if it is the right approach.

Thanks in advance ##\forall## help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose ##f(r) = r^7##.

##\frac{d f(r)}{dr} = 7r^6 \ne \text{constant}##

am I good so far?
 
This means we have to show ##f(r)=r+C##. Or am I missing anything?
 
Read your own question and imagine you are someone else reading it. Does that person know what ##f## is?

If not, you have some editing to do.
 
Oh! Ok... Let me edit it.
 
oliverkahn said:
To prove: ##\dfrac{d[f(r)]}{dr}=## constant
oliverkahn said:
This means we have to show ##f(r)=r+C##. Or am I missing anything?
What you're trying to prove amounts to solving a simple differential equation.
##\dfrac{d[f(r)]}{dr}= k \Rightarrow d~f(r) = k~dr \Rightarrow \int d~f(r) = \int k~dr##
Can you take it from here?
 
Actually I am trying to understand the paragraphs in the following article:

2.PNG

3.PNG

4.PNG


My teacher has shown the proof to me only until the fourth last equation, i.e. ##0= f'(a+p)-f'(a-p)##

From here I have to get ##f'(r)=C##. Any clue?
 
Since ##a## and ##p## are independent, let ##x=a+p## and ##y=a-p##. ##x## and ##y## are also independent. So ##f'(x) = f'(y)## for every ##x## and ##y##. Pretty much the definition of constant.
 
  • Informative
Likes oliverkahn
I also have a question about this:
$$r^2=a^2-2ap\cos\theta+p^2\Rightarrow 2rdr=2ap\sin\theta$$
Why can he consider the differential with respect to ##r## as equal to the differential with respect to ##\theta##?
Never mind, chain rule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K