How to reduce vibration of a fixed beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Vibration
AI Thread Summary
To reduce the vibration of a fixed beam under a distributed load, implementing a mass-spring system can be effective. This method involves using a secondary system to dampen the vibrations of the primary beam. The Stockbridge Damper, commonly used on cantilevered structures like highway signs, is an example of a mass-flexible rod system that mitigates vibratory oscillations. Visual references for these setups may be limited, but further research can provide clarity on their application. Understanding these concepts can help in effectively addressing beam vibration issues.
theone
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
If I want to reduce the vibration of a beam fixed at one end, under a distributed load, does anyone know what this would involve? In the textbook, there is the idea of having a second system consisting of a mass-spring combination to reduce the vibration of the primary system.
But I can't find any real life pictures of this setup, so I don't know what this would look like. I was wondering if someone could explain a little more about the situation or other options.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You may be talking about a mass-flexible rod system called the Stockbridge Damper that is sometimes used on cantilevered highway signs near the free end to offset (dampen) the vibratory oscillations. Google it for more info.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top