How to Show Lorentz's Identity with Relative Speed?

wtronic
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


start from:
x = [x' + vt']/sqrt[1 - v^2/c^2]
ct = [v/cx' +ct']/sqrt[1 - v^2/c^2]
y = y'
z = z'

Homework Equations


show that

( 1 - \frac{u^{2}}{c^{2}})(1+\frac{vux'^{2}}{c^{2}}) = ( 1 - \frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}})(1-\frac{u'^{2}}{c^{2}})


The Attempt at a Solution



ok, I have spent many hours on this crappy thing. We have no book in class so...
I derived the lorentz transformation for ux, uy, and uz... as well as u'x', u'y', u'z'... then i computed the velocities in each fram using u = sqrt[ ux^2 + uy^2 + uz^2] and the same for u'. Nevertheless I end up in some mess of algebraic letters that get me nowhere close to the answer. I just need some sort of hit as to how to approach this problem.

thansk for any hints.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are u,v,u' ? Is -v the velocity of unprimed system wrt the primed system? Then what's u? I suggest that you post the entire problem as it was given. That way, there's no scope for confusion.
 
yeah, I know it is confusing... but that is the whole problem... exactly as it was given to us.
For what understand it is like this

u = speed of particle 1 in S frame of reference
u = sqrt[ux^2 + uy^2 + uz^2]
u' = speed of same particle after a lorentz transformation in the S' frame of reference
u' = sqrt[u'x^2 + u'y^2 + u'z^2]

now, v would be the speed of one reference with respect to the other. I assume it is the v that carries over from the gamma sqrt[1-v^2/c^2] from the lorentz transformation.

sorry about my notation, but I can't understand how to use latex yet.

thanks for the reply
 
this the actual equation

[text]1+u_{x}single-quoteV/c^2=\sqrt(1-usingle-quote^2/c^2)*\sqrt(1-V^2/c^2)/\sqrt(1-u^2/c^2)[/text]
 
Last edited:
never mind guys, i found the answer... i will post the stepwise solution when i get a chance to write it on latex or scan it
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top