How to show that cloning by measurement is impossible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of cloning quantum states, specifically addressing the no-cloning theorem in the context of non-unitary measurement apparatuses. The participant suggests that while traditional proofs rely on unitary operations, the challenge remains to demonstrate cloning impossibility when measurements are involved. They propose using the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) to show that if cloning is impossible in MWI, it must also be impossible in the Copenhagen Interpretation (CI). This approach highlights the significance of interpretation in simplifying complex quantum problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the no-cloning theorem in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum measurement theory
  • Knowledge of Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) and Copenhagen Interpretation (CI)
  • Basic concepts of quantum entanglement and unitary evolution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the no-cloning theorem in quantum information theory
  • Study the differences between Many-Worlds Interpretation and Copenhagen Interpretation
  • Explore quantum measurement techniques and their effects on state evolution
  • Investigate entanglement swapping and its role in quantum cloning scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum information science, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts will benefit from this discussion.

greypilgrim
Messages
583
Reaction score
44
Hi,

I know the common proof of the no-cloning theorem assuming the cloning apparatus acts unitarily on the system and leading this to a contradiction.

But what about a non-unitarian apparatus that involves measurements? I'm pretty sure cloning is still impossible, but I don't know how to prove it in full generality, since you could do very elaborate measurement procedures that could involve entanglement swapping or unitarily evolving parts.

Somebody knows a short proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just off the top of my head, you can do the proof in MWI, where measurements are unitary, and then use equivalence of MWI and CI to say that if you can't clone a state under MWI, you can't do it under Copenhagen either.

This might not be satisfactory if you really want a full proof that takes collapse into account, but it's an easy check of validity. In general, choice of interpretation can often make a problem a lot easier if you are careful with it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
10K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K