How to solve 2nd order diff. equation for simple harmonic motion

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the second-order differential equation for simple harmonic motion (SHM) in the context of LC and LRC circuits. The equation m(d^2x/dt^2) + (k/m)x = 0 can be approached by assuming a solution of the form x(t) = A exp(λt), leading to the characteristic equation λ^2 + ω^2 = 0. This results in two complex solutions for λ, which can be expressed as a superposition of two linearly independent solutions. The general solution is x(t) = A1 exp(iωt) + A2 exp(-iωt), with constants A1 and A2 determined by initial conditions. The discussion emphasizes that solving differential equations requires practice and understanding of their structure, rather than mere guesswork.
cjurban
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
In my physics class we're talking about LC and LRC circuits, and the equations are analogous to those for SHM. However, I don't see how x=Acos(ωt+\varphi) satisfies m(d^2x/dt^2)+(k/m)x=0. I've never done differential equations and in the book it seemed like the author just guessed and checked until he found the right solution, and this doesn't seem like a satisfactory answer. How did he solve this equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the assumed solution, do the requisite manipulation, and see if it satisfies the ODE. Any unknown constants can be determined using initial conditions. You have taken derivatives of trig functions, haven't you?
 
Well, solving differential equations is an art. You just have to practice it to find solutions. There is of course a lot of work done by the mathematicians to provide general theorems about their structure and that of their solutions.

In your case of circuit theory or the harmonic oscillator you have a particularly nice class of differential equations, namely a linear differential equation. Here, it's even the kind with constant coefficients. For the undamped harmonic oscillator it reads
\ddot{x}+\omega^2 x=0.

Here the standard ansatz to find a solution is
x(t)=A \exp(\lambda t).
Plugging this into the equation you find
\lambda^2+\omega^2=0.
There are two solutions for \lambda, namely
\lambda_{1/2}=\pm \mathrm{i} \omega.
Now the mathematicians have proven that any solution is given as the superposition of two linearly independent solutions, and these we just have found! So the general solution is
x(t)=A_1 \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t) + A_2 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t).
The constants A_1 and A_2 are determined by giving initial values, e.g., position and velocity at t=0.
 
I have a book that does something similar and I'm not sure the book was guessing and checking. I think they were showing why other functions don't satisfy the given ODE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
984