How to Solve a Parametric Vector Problem Involving Perpendicular Vectors?

3 replies · 2K views · last reply
gomess
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Printed exercise 14: two lines L1 and L2 given in parametric form, with a request to find points P1 on L1 and P2 on L2 where P1P2 is perpendicular to both lines, plus a hint about direction vectors.


Homework Equations


(x,y,z)=(x0,y0,z0) + t(m1,m2,m3)


The Attempt at a Solution


So at first I thought that since vector P1P2 is at right angles to both lines, both lines must be parallel. Quickly dismissed this idea since their direction vectors are not multiples of one another. Then I thought P1P2 could be the cross product of both direction vectors... crossed both vectors and got P1P2=(-1,3,1). Not sure if that's the right approach, and not sure what to do from here. Any help would be great!
 
Attachments
  • Printed textbook problem 14 giving two parametric lines L1: x = 4 + 2t, y = 4 + t, z = -3 - t, and L2: x = -2 + 3s, y = -7 + 2s, z = 2 - 3s, asking for points P1 and P2 with P1P2 perpendicular to both lines.
    Untitled.jpg
    17.4 KB · Views: 506
Last edited:
gomess said:

Homework Statement


Attached thumbnail


Homework Equations


(x,y,z)=(x0,y0,z0) + t(m1,m2,m3)


The Attempt at a Solution


So at first I thought that since vector P1P2 is at right angles to both lines, both lines must be parallel. Quickly dismissed this idea since their direction vectors are not multiples of one another. Then I thought P1P2 could be the cross product of both direction vectors... crossed both vectors and got P1P2=(-1,3,1). Not sure if that's the right approach, and not sure what to do from here. Any help would be great!
Posting the image will make it more likely that your question will get attention:

Problem 14 text: two lines L1: x = 4 + 2t, y = 4 + t, z = -3 - t, t in R, and L2: x = -2 + 3s, y = -7 + 2s, z = 2 - 3s, s in R. Find points P1 on L1 and P2 on L2 with P1P2 perpendicular to both lines.


I haven't worked through the problem, but it seems to me that the dot product (scalar product) may work better.
 
I'll try using the scalar product and see where it gets me.
Edit: No progress. I figured that since P1 lies on L1, some value of 't' would take me to P1 and from there, vector P1P2 would take me to P2 (assuming P1P2 is the cross product of the direction vectors).
 
Last edited:
gomess said:
I'll try using the scalar product and see where it gets me.
Edit: No progress. I figured that since P1 lies on L1, some value of 't' would take me to P1 and from there, vector P1P2 would take me to P2 (assuming P1P2 is the cross product of the direction vectors).

Oh! Yes, that should work for the direction of ##\displaystyle\vec{P_1P_2} \ .\ ## You were correct about the result of <-1, 3, 1>