How to Solve Equations with Unknown Exponents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter foxyman20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
foxyman20
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok i know this should be a relatively simple equation but i haven't done this stuff in so long i can't remember how to solve it. here goes.

4^(x+2) = 7^x +681

Solve for x

I know the answer is 3 from simple trial and error but i can't show the work to prove it and i know that harder problems exist so i would like to know the procedure. I'm pretty sure that either logs or natural logs (LN) is required somehow. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
well i figure the physics people should have no problem with this.

Ok i know this should be a relatively simple equation but i haven't done this stuff in so long i can't remember how to solve it. here goes.

4^(x+2) = 7^x +681

Solve for x

I know the answer is 3 from simple trial and error but i can't show the work to prove it and i know that harder problems exist so i would like to know the procedure. I'm pretty sure that either logs or natural logs (LN) is required somehow. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
 
there's no easy way to solve an equation that has a polynomial on one side and a transcendental function on the other. Sorry.

P.S. there is another solution near 4.8622 too, but no other solutions besides that one.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top