How to solve for unknown charge position

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhizKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Position
Click For Summary
To solve for the unknown charge position, it's essential to analyze the relative directions of the forces acting on it, as they must cancel each other out. The discussion emphasizes that the unknown charge, q3, cannot be positioned on the right side due to the overpowering influence of the charge on that side. The forces must be equal in magnitude, leading to the equation that relates the charges and their distances. A suggestion is made to create a diagram to visualize the forces and refine the search area for q3's position. The importance of considering the signs of the forces is also highlighted, though it is suggested to focus on magnitudes initially.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


W5C4LHO.png

Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law

43cfd29869833e7377d49cc8b89c101c.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Here are 2 different possibilities I drew that I think will have the x component vectors and y component vectors cancel out, but I think there may be some other positions as well.

baNMyVf.png


rnq0pAd.png


##\textbf{F}_x = k_e [\frac{(1.0 \textrm{ uC} \cdot q3) \cdot cos(\theta_1) \cdot \hat{r}_{13}}{{r_1}^2} + \frac{(-3.0 \textrm{ uC} \cdot q3) \cdot cos(\theta_2) \cdot \hat{r}_{23}}{{r_2}^2}]##

##\textbf{F}_y = k_e [\frac{(1.0 \textrm{ uC} \cdot q3) \cdot sin(\theta_1) \cdot \hat{r}_{13}}{{r_1}^2} + \frac{(-3.0 \textrm{ uC} \cdot q3) \cdot sin(\theta_2) \cdot \hat{r}_{23}}{{r_2}^2}]##

But there are so many unknowns and I only have one equation (Coulomb's) so I'm not sure what to do from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to narrow the search considerably by considering:

1) If two forces are to completely cancel, what must be their relative directions?
2) What are the directions that the electric forces act between the fixed charges and the unknown charges?

In what way do the answers to the above two items constrain the possible location of q3?
 
Hint: For two vectors to be able to cancel each other, what angle must they make with each other?

That should simplify your answer.

Edit: gneill beat me to it!
 
gneill said:
You should be able to narrow the search considerably by considering:

1) If two forces are to completely cancel, what must be their relative directions?
2) What are the directions that the electric forces act between the fixed charges and the unknown charges?

Oh, as I was thinking about answering your questions I just realized I need to completely review vectors...but now I see that the unknown charge has to be somewhere axis along the fixed charges, but since the force is inversely proportional to the distance, it can't be on the right side because the charge on the right would overpower the one on the left.
 
Okay, so the magnitudes of the two forces have to equal each other:

##k_e \cdot \frac{|q_1||q_3|}{{r_1}^2} = k_e \cdot \frac{|q_2||q_3|}{({r_1 + L)}^2}##

Cancel out the constant and unknown charge:

##\frac{|q_1|}{{r_1}^2} = \frac{|q_2|}{({r_1 + L)}^2}##

But here I have a question about the signs of the force. Since we're only working with the magnitude, do I need to add a negative sign somewhere?
 
I suggest that you make another drawing and use it to further narrow down the region of interest. Then you can write expressions for the force magnitudes without any signs involved. For example:

attachment.php?attachmentid=61297&stc=1&d=1377962631.gif


The diagram shows there's only one region that the third charge can be located so that zero net force can occur.

Since all the given values have similar units (μC, cm), you can drop those too when you write the equality.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    3.3 KB · Views: 544
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K