How to Solve Projectile Motion Problems in One or Two Lines

AI Thread Summary
Projectile motion problems can be efficiently solved in one or two lines by prioritizing key parameters over time. The discussion introduces two main equations that connect five essential variables: horizontal displacement, vertical displacement, initial horizontal velocity, initial vertical velocity, and final vertical velocity. By treating these variables as a system of equations, one can derive the time of flight using the formula Δx/v0x. Additionally, three auxiliary shortcut equations are provided to streamline the process of identifying parameters. This method offers advantages over traditional approaches, making it a valuable strategy for solving projectile motion problems.
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
15,738
Reaction score
8,937
Introduction
We show how one can solve most if not all, introductory-level projectile motion problems in one or maybe two lines. To this end, we forgo convention.  We demote clock time ##t## to a parameter of secondary importance and ditch the independence of motion in the vertical and horizontal directions.
Starting from the first principles, we develop two primary equations that relate five “basic” parameters to each other: ##\Delta x##, ##\Delta y##, ##v_{0x}##, ##v_{0y}## and ##v_y## (standard definitions).  We view the solution of projectile motion problems as equivalent to solving a system of five equations with the five basic parameters as the five unknowns.  Once the system is solved, the time of flight, if one must have it, is just the ratio ##\Delta x/v_{0x}##.
To sharpen the implementation of the primary equations, we recombine them to derive three auxiliary shortcut equations that facilitate the identification of equation parameters with given variables.  Finally, we...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Dale, neilparker62, BvU and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a nice approach. It does seem to have some advantages over the standard approach.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top