How to take the time derivative of a potential gradient ?

AI Thread Summary
To take the time derivative of a potential gradient, one must consider the specific context, such as whether it pertains to gravitational or electric potential gradients. The time derivative of a gravity gradient is often negligible, suggesting that gradients may not inherently change over time. The discussion emphasizes the need for additional information to clarify the conditions under which a potential gradient might have a time rate of change. The inquiry into electric potential gradients raises further questions about the assumptions behind their variability. Understanding the specifics is crucial for accurately addressing the time derivative of any potential gradient.
Pet Scan
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I am not that great at vector calculus , etc.
Can someone show me how to take the time rate of change of a potential gradient? (Not homework)
Thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pet Scan said:
I am not that great at vector calculus , etc.
Can someone show me how to take the time rate of change of a potential gradient? (Not homework)
Thx.

Consider the gravity gradient above a planet. It's time derivative is practically zero. There is no a priori reason for a gradient to have a time rate of change.

So your question makes no sense without more information.
 
Just to clarify...I didn't say a gravitational gradient. How about an electric potential gradient?
 
Pet Scan said:
Just to clarify...I didn't say a gravitational gradient. How about an electric potential gradient?

OK, why do you think it has a time rate of change?
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Does Fluid Dynamics Explain Pressure Gradients in a Frictionless Tube?
Replies
48
Views
6K
Lagrange multipliers understanding
Replies
8
Views
2K
Relativistic hydrodynamics: gradient expansion
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Principle of Physics: Derivation of -dU/dx=F
Replies
24
Views
2K
A Origin of Hertzian dipole radiation
Replies
21
Views
2K
Relationship of Gradients to Work, PE and KE
Replies
1
Views
2K
I What's the physical meaning of Curl of Curl of a Vector Field?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Time derivative using the quotient rule
Replies
1
Views
813
I How can concentration gradient field come into existence immediately?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Is there place for higher order derivatives in mechanics?
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top