How To Travel at The Speed of Light

JtValentine
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I'm no physicist, but I just had a random thought. So they say that traveling at the speed of light is impossible because the mass of the engine would have to be constructed infinitely big. But what if the propulsion didn't come from the spacecraft ?

I was wondering what you guys and gals thought about a device that would pull the spacecraft to the speed of light, instead of push. Think of a slingshot.

It was just a random thought. It may be totally idiotic. I don't know, I just love physics. :)

What do yall think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The impossibility of traveling at the speed of light results from you having mass. Only massless particles can travel at the speed of light, and they must do so.
 
JtValentine said:
I was wondering what you guys and gals thought about a device that would pull the spacecraft to the speed of light, instead of push. Think of a slingshot.
You'd still need 'infinite' energy, so a slingshot won't help.
 
D H said:
The impossibility of traveling at the speed of light results from you having mass. Only massless particles can travel at the speed of light, and they must do so.

Ah. I'm dumb. Thanks!
 
No matter how fast you are travelling, relative to how you started, you will still measure the speed of light traveling away from you at c. So basically, no matter how fast you get going, you are essentially never any closer to getting to close to the speed of light, since you will always measure the speed of light the same from every frame of reference.

Unless you are a nuetrino of course.
 
JtValentine said:
Okay, so I'm no physicist, but I just had a random thought. So they say that traveling at the speed of light is impossible because the mass of the engine would have to be constructed infinitely big. But what if the propulsion didn't come from the spacecraft ?

I was wondering what you guys and gals thought about a device that would pull the spacecraft to the speed of light, instead of push. Think of a slingshot.

It was just a random thought. It may be totally idiotic. I don't know, I just love physics. :)

What do yall think?

If you have the time to wait, you could let yourself free fall from infinity into a black hole. When you reach the event horizon you should have a relative velocity of c with the black hole in accordance with classical physics. However, GR might determine the relative velocity to be other than exactly c.

If you are in a hurry you could start from a shorter distance from the black hole and accelerate toward it such that upon free falling the rest of the distance to the black hole your relative velocity with the black hole is c when you reach the event horizon. Again, this is according to classical physics.

So in essence a black hole would be pulling rather than pushing you.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top