How to turn a proton into neutron by e+p->n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NERV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutron Proton
NERV
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
how to turn a proton into neutron by e+p-->n?

Just as the topic said,is it possible to turn a proton into a neutron by forcing a electron into the proton?If it's possible,what condition is it required?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n^0 \rightarrow p^+ + e^- + \overline\nu _e
 
Last edited:


Actually it's completely possible provided your electron has enough energy, it will turn itself into a neutrino and the proton into a neutron (via W^{-} exchange, a u becomes a d, both quarks being in the same SU(2) isospin doublet connected by this exchange).

Note that the reaction is as interesting as its final state is daunting.
 


I know there is a way of electron capture.But,how much energy is it needed?In other words,WHAT CONDITION is the capture reaction required?
 


NERV said:
I know there is a way of electron capture.But,how much energy is it needed?In other words,WHAT CONDITION is the capture reaction required?
Electron capture usually refers to unstable isotope. It's a spontaneous atomic and nuclear process. I was referring to an electron beam on a hydrogen target. But in any case, the energy required will be given by the differences between the masses (and you can neglect the mass of the neutrino !). If you have an electron incident on a free proton, the balance is positive anyway by slightly less than 0.8 MeV.
 


Thanks a lot.Your quote was what I was answering #2,not for you ^-^.And you seems to have the same idea(to beam hydrogen targets with electrons).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top