B How to use the Binary Mass Function for exoplanets?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astroxzip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exoplanets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the mass of the exoplanet KELT-8b using radial velocity values, with confusion surrounding the binary mass function and its units. The user initially assumed solar masses as the unit but obtained an incorrect mass of 3.48 solar masses, diverging from established findings. Clarification is sought on how to properly interpret the radial velocity curve and condense the data for accurate mass calculations. The binary mass function is noted to constrain the mass of an unseen component in a binary system, but its unit definitions remain unclear. The user is encouraged to refine their method of averaging radial velocity values to improve accuracy in their calculations.
Astroxzip
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Hi. I am working on a research paper for my high school and I am trying to calculate the mass of an exoplanet using the radial velocity values of its star. However, I am confused as to the binary mass function and what units you would use. I also wanted to know how you would interpret a radial velocity curve to calculate the mass of the exoplanet. Thank you
The paper I am using for my radial velocity values is the following (Table 4)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/30
Hi. I am working on a research paper for my high school and I am trying to calculate the mass of KELT-8b using the radial velocity values of its star. However, I am confused as to the binary mass function and what units you would use. I was under the impression you would use solar masses however I am getting a mass of 3.48 solar masses which is nothing close to the mass they found in the paper. I also wanted to know how you would interpret a radial velocity curve to calculate the mass of the exoplanet because I figured maybe I found the radial velocity the wrong way. The way I did it was by taking an average of the peaks after graphing it against the time. Thank you
The paper I am using for my radial velocity values is the following (Table 4)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/30
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Here is how to find how something is defined in a scientific paper.
  1. Look for a definition in the paper.
  2. If there is no definition, look for a reference to what you are looking for. Get that paper.
  3. Look for a definition in that paper.
  4. Repeat as needed.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Here is how to find how something is defined in a scientific paper.
  1. Look for a definition in the paper.
  2. If there is no definition, look for a reference to what you are looking for. Get that paper.
  3. Look for a definition in that paper.
  4. Repeat as needed.
Hi. I know how they have defined the radial velocity values. The problem is I do not know how the binary mass function works and what units you need for the function.
 
The phrase "binary mass function" does not appear in the paper you cite. Where did you come across the term and how is it defined?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Ibix said:
The phrase "binary mass function" does not appear in the paper you cite. Where did you come across the term and how is it defined?
Ok so, basically the paper I am writing needs me to calculate the mass using radial velocity method. After doing some research, I found the binary mass function in an Astrophysics textbook which I found could work for exoplanets. However the problem is that the units are not defined anywhere which is the main source of issue. As for how it is defined, the binary mass function constrains the mass of the unseen component of a binary system, which in my case is the mass. As for the paper I cited, I used it for the values of the radial velocity, however I am struggling a bit to understand how to condense them into one for my calculations. I ended up taking an average of the five highest values however I think my answer could have deviated due to the method I chose to condense the radial velocity values into one.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top