How to verify your claim in this fire experiement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 999iscool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire
AI Thread Summary
In the fire experiment with a candle under a jar, the flame eventually extinguishes due to the depletion of oxygen. The discussion centers on verifying the claim that the amount of CO2 produced equals the amount of O2 consumed, emphasizing the conservation of mass and energy. It is noted that the number of O2 molecules used must match the number of carbon atoms burned, impacting the resulting CO2 production. Additionally, the conversation raises questions about measuring heat loss from the jar and identifying other chemical products formed during combustion. Accurate quantitative measurements are essential to confirm these claims regarding the combustion process.
999iscool
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If we initially lighted a candle, and then put a jar over it, what can we say about the fire? What kind of observations can we make?

How can you verify your claim?

The Attempt at a Solution



Well the observations are quite obvious. The flame is put off soon or later.

I want to know is it true that there is as much CO2 produced as O2 used? If the initial state has 10 C, and 10 O2 molecules, we can make 10 CO2. The mass + energy is conserved, also.
What kind of scientific sensor / tool can detect and find out the composition of air (quantitatively) ?

I haven't done chemistry for a few years so I am sorry for the abrupt question here. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
999iscool said:
I want to know is it true that there is as much CO2 produced as O2 used? If the initial state has 10 C, and 10 O2 molecules, we can make 10 CO2.

If there is 10 plus 10 you are OK, but what if you have 5 plus 10, or 10 plus 5?
 
Hi Borek,

Thanks for the response.

With 10 carbon and 5 O2, you can only make 5 CO2 and 5 carbon atoms left alone.
With 5 carbon atoms and 10 O2, you can make 5 CO2 as well.

So" the number of O2 molecules used should equal to the number of carbon atoms used; the total energy and mass of the system should be conserved inside."

This brings up two more sub questions:
1. how can we make sure there is no loss of heat? or how do we calculate the loss of heat because the jar is not insulated-proof?
2. what are other chemical products produced during the burning process?

Precisely, we do need to measure the inside quantitatively in order to verify our claims that heat is generated and oxygen is consumed during burning and that carbon dioxide are also produced.

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top