How we compute killing vector for two-sphere

off-diagonal
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
The metric on S^2 is given by,
\displaystyle ds^2=d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2


Here's the answer

\displaystyle \xi ^{\mu}_{(1)}\partial _{\mu} = \partial_{\phi}

\displaystyle \xi^{\mu}_{(2)}\partial_{\mu} = \ -(cos\phi \partial_{\theta} - cot\theta sin\phi \partial_{\phi})

\displaystyle \xi^{\mu}_{(3)}\partial_{\mu} = sin\phi \partial_{\theta} + cot\theta cos\phi \partial_{\phi}

from Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Development by Frolov & Novikov
Appendix B

Anyone can explain me how to compute this 3 Killing vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to pull off the g_{\mu\nu} from the line element and then easily calculate the inverses g^{\mu\nu}. Then you have to calculate the Christoffel symbols from the metric components (looking hard at the equations for these, can you see which symbols will be non-vanishing ahead of time?). Then you know how the covariant derivative acts (See standard equations for GR). Then the Killing vector equation is \nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu} + \nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=0. After you've carefully written these things out, you can do some integrals to pull out the Killing vectors from the above equation.
 
javierR said:
You'll need to pull off the g_{\mu\nu} from the line element and then easily calculate the inverses g^{\mu\nu}. Then you have to calculate the Christoffel symbols from the metric components (looking hard at the equations for these, can you see which symbols will be non-vanishing ahead of time?). Then you know how the covariant derivative acts (See standard equations for GR). Then the Killing vector equation is \nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu} + \nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=0. After you've carefully written these things out, you can do some integrals to pull out the Killing vectors from the above equation.

Thank you for your answer
but after I perform calculation. I found a problem that may cause from my misunderstand about Killing vector equation.

Here's the detail
from these metric
\displaystyle ds^2=d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2 I can read out metric tensor component as \displaystyle g_{\theta}_{\theta}= 1 g_{\phi}_{\phi}=sin^2\theta
so I can compute Christoffel symbol , there are two component in S^2 case
\displaystyle \Gamma^{\theta}_{\phi\phi}=-sin\theta cos\theta
\displaystyle \Gamma^{\phi}_{\phi \theta}=cot\theta

and from Killing equation I've got three equation

\displaystyle \mu=\nu=\theta
\displaystyle \partial_{\theta}\xi_{\theta}=0 since there are no \displaystyle \Gamma^{i}_{\theta\theta}

\displaystyle \mu=\nu=\phi
\displaystyle \partial_{\phi}\xi_{\phi}+sin\theta cos\theta \xi_{\theta}= 0

\displaystyle \mu=\theta,\nu=\phi
\displaystyle \partial_{\theta}\xi_{\phi}+\partial_{\phi}\xi_{\theta}-2cot\theta \xi_{\phi}= 0

What should I do next? to find all {\xi}
PS. since my answer has a term which depend on\phi but until my last calculation I found no \phi terms appear so am I miscalculate somewhere above?
 
Sorry, I didn't see your message till now. If you still need it: Now you can solve for the \xi_{\mu} by integration for each of the three equations. Try finding the form of the theta one first and then proceed to the next one using that result, and so on. You'll have to do some analysis to get the explicit form of the functions, and don't forget the presence of integration constants (constant with respect to one or both variables that is, since we're dealing with partial derivatives). Once you get the functions for theta and phi, you can easily invert them with the form of the metric you wrote down. Then the independent Killing vectors are \xi^{\theta}\partial_{\theta} and \xi^{\phi}\partial_{\phi}, and a general Killing vector is a linear combination of these. (You can also show that you can write such a Killing vector split into three parts corresponding to generators of rotations on the sphere).
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top