How we compute killing vector for two-sphere

off-diagonal
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
The metric on S^2 is given by,
\displaystyle ds^2=d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2


Here's the answer

\displaystyle \xi ^{\mu}_{(1)}\partial _{\mu} = \partial_{\phi}

\displaystyle \xi^{\mu}_{(2)}\partial_{\mu} = \ -(cos\phi \partial_{\theta} - cot\theta sin\phi \partial_{\phi})

\displaystyle \xi^{\mu}_{(3)}\partial_{\mu} = sin\phi \partial_{\theta} + cot\theta cos\phi \partial_{\phi}

from Black Hole Physics: Basic Concepts and New Development by Frolov & Novikov
Appendix B

Anyone can explain me how to compute this 3 Killing vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to pull off the g_{\mu\nu} from the line element and then easily calculate the inverses g^{\mu\nu}. Then you have to calculate the Christoffel symbols from the metric components (looking hard at the equations for these, can you see which symbols will be non-vanishing ahead of time?). Then you know how the covariant derivative acts (See standard equations for GR). Then the Killing vector equation is \nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu} + \nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=0. After you've carefully written these things out, you can do some integrals to pull out the Killing vectors from the above equation.
 
javierR said:
You'll need to pull off the g_{\mu\nu} from the line element and then easily calculate the inverses g^{\mu\nu}. Then you have to calculate the Christoffel symbols from the metric components (looking hard at the equations for these, can you see which symbols will be non-vanishing ahead of time?). Then you know how the covariant derivative acts (See standard equations for GR). Then the Killing vector equation is \nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu} + \nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=0. After you've carefully written these things out, you can do some integrals to pull out the Killing vectors from the above equation.

Thank you for your answer
but after I perform calculation. I found a problem that may cause from my misunderstand about Killing vector equation.

Here's the detail
from these metric
\displaystyle ds^2=d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2 I can read out metric tensor component as \displaystyle g_{\theta}_{\theta}= 1 g_{\phi}_{\phi}=sin^2\theta
so I can compute Christoffel symbol , there are two component in S^2 case
\displaystyle \Gamma^{\theta}_{\phi\phi}=-sin\theta cos\theta
\displaystyle \Gamma^{\phi}_{\phi \theta}=cot\theta

and from Killing equation I've got three equation

\displaystyle \mu=\nu=\theta
\displaystyle \partial_{\theta}\xi_{\theta}=0 since there are no \displaystyle \Gamma^{i}_{\theta\theta}

\displaystyle \mu=\nu=\phi
\displaystyle \partial_{\phi}\xi_{\phi}+sin\theta cos\theta \xi_{\theta}= 0

\displaystyle \mu=\theta,\nu=\phi
\displaystyle \partial_{\theta}\xi_{\phi}+\partial_{\phi}\xi_{\theta}-2cot\theta \xi_{\phi}= 0

What should I do next? to find all {\xi}
PS. since my answer has a term which depend on\phi but until my last calculation I found no \phi terms appear so am I miscalculate somewhere above?
 
Sorry, I didn't see your message till now. If you still need it: Now you can solve for the \xi_{\mu} by integration for each of the three equations. Try finding the form of the theta one first and then proceed to the next one using that result, and so on. You'll have to do some analysis to get the explicit form of the functions, and don't forget the presence of integration constants (constant with respect to one or both variables that is, since we're dealing with partial derivatives). Once you get the functions for theta and phi, you can easily invert them with the form of the metric you wrote down. Then the independent Killing vectors are \xi^{\theta}\partial_{\theta} and \xi^{\phi}\partial_{\phi}, and a general Killing vector is a linear combination of these. (You can also show that you can write such a Killing vector split into three parts corresponding to generators of rotations on the sphere).
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top