How would this work on the moon? theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter howsitwork
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Theory Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how objects like ropes or flags would behave on the moon, focusing on the effects of a vacuum and reduced gravity. It highlights that while inertia will cause a delay in movement, the lack of atmospheric drag will allow the lower part of flexible objects to move faster than on Earth. Specifically, when a handkerchief is moved, its bottom edge will appear to drag along more quickly due to the absence of air resistance. The conversation also references the iconic waving of the moon landing flag, explaining that it results from the motion of its support rather than wind. Overall, the unique lunar environment significantly alters the dynamics of object movement compared to Earth.
howsitwork
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
how would this work on the moon?? theory..

i already posted this in the astrophysics forum, but i know this is visited a lot more, and this isn't that advanced. it's also kind of time-sensitive, so i figured id post here in hopes someone stumbles along and knows how to explain it.. thanks..

basically I am thinking this, if you were in a complete vacuum, say, on the moon, and held down a rope from your hand, it would be mildly pulled toward the center of the moon, but if you were to move your hand parallel to the moon's surface (like from straight out in front of you, perpendicular to your chest, and moved it ninety degrees to straight in line with your shoulders), how would the rope follow? would it follow the same as on earth? would the 'delay' be the same. as in would the top (your hand) move first and fastest and would the rest of the rope follow as what happens here?? what about a flag, or hankerchief held spread out, and you moved it closer or farther from you, like a bull-fighter, what would that motion visibly look like? how would the lack of atmosphere and wind resistance effect it??

im more questioning the bull-fighter part. i know the flag would want to stay straight perpendicular to the moon due to gravity, but how would it's movement be effected considering there's no resistance from air, wind, or atmosphere?? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Howsitwork.
You're forgetting about inertia. Any flexible object will still follow the same basic initial pattern as it would on Earth, because the mass of the object will be reluctant to move. I can't tell you what exact pattern it will be, but I'm sure that someone else here can.
 
Howsitwork,

I think you pretty much covered it. Due to lack of atmospheric drag and less gravity, the lower part of the handkerchief should "drag-along" faster than it would on Earth. As Danger already mentioned, the inertia will still make it drag along rather than moving in sync with your hand (top portion of the handkerchief). I would assume that the lack of atmosphere plays the greatest role in making the difference here since you are talking about a loose material like handkerchief.
 
I believe that in one of the videos of a moon walk you can see a flag "waving" due the effect you are asking about. The top edge of the flag is supported by a stiff wire so it hangs as if there were a strong wind, the bottom edge of the flag waves as if it were being blown, but it is just the motion of the support causing the flag to move.
 
Yeah, that's a favourite target of the 'faked moon landing' conspiracy theorists. They can't understand why the flag was 'waving' without air.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top