How would you calculate how bodies curve space/time?

zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
Okay, I am really interested in relativity, but very ignorant in it also. I already know you would divide regular space/time by

√(1 - rs/r)

rs = schwarzschilds radius
r = radius of object from center of mass

How would we define regular space/time in an equation? What units or dimensions do we get the answer in. Thanks in advanced for answering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeromodz said:
Okay, I am really interested in relativity, but very ignorant in it also. I already know you would divide regular space/time by

√(1 - rs/r)

rs = schwarzschilds radius
r = radius of object from center of mass

How would we define regular space/time in an equation? What units or dimensions do we get the answer in. Thanks in advanced for answering.

Look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric

Here some visualizations of it:
http://www.relativitet.se/spacetime1.html
http://www.adamtoons.de/physics/gravitation.swf
 
zeromodz said:
Okay, I am really interested in relativity, but very ignorant in it also. I already know you would divide regular space/time by

√(1 - rs/r)

rs = schwarzschilds radius
r = radius of object from center of mass

How would we define regular space/time in an equation? What units or dimensions do we get the answer in. Thanks in advanced for answering.

If you don't need to handle really strong fields, you can just use the approximation that the curvature is 1/R = g/c2 where g is the Newtonian acceleration. That value gives the effective acceleration g = c2/R for something at rest, and also gives the curvature of space, so that if the speed is v perpendicularly to the field there is an extra acceleration of v2/R, and if v=c the total acceleration is twice the Newtonian value.
 
You calculate how matter/energy curve space-time by solving the Einstein Field Equations.

The Swarzchild metric is one exact solution (the first one that was found! Other than the normal flat metric (or sometimes called the Minkowski space)) to Einstein's field equations. This solution is valid for non-rotating, non-charged, black holes (basically the space around a spherical object that just sits there). There are others, such as the Kerr metric for a rotating black hole. And there are even others where the space is not "empty" such as for these solutions, and therefore the stress-energy tensor is non-zero (I'm not sure if we've found any exact solutions to those).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equation
 
Zeromodz, this is not a simple question with a simple answer. It's not the kind of thing where people can just give you a couple of formulas and then you'll be all set. You might want to start by reading a good elementary description of general relativity, such as the one in Hewitt's Conceptual Physics, or Relativity Simply Explained by Gardner.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top