How write a matrix in terms of determinant and trace?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing a matrix in terms of its trace (T) and determinant (D). Participants explore various matrix forms that satisfy these conditions, noting that there are infinitely many possible constructions. They emphasize that T and D are the only invariants, suggesting that the matrices should be similar. However, a general formula for this expression does not exist. The conversation concludes with a humorous note about a participant's response needing to meet a character limit.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Given the following: $$\\ \begin{bmatrix}
A & 0\\
0 & B\\
\end{bmatrix}$$ the eigenvalues is exactaly A and B. So analogously, is possible to write a matrix with only two elements, T and D, such that the trace is T and the determinant is D?

I tried something: $$\\ \text{tr} \left(
\begin{bmatrix}
\frac{1}{2}T & 0\\
0 & \frac{1}{2}T\\
\end{bmatrix}
\right) = T $$
$$\\ \text{det} \left(
\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt{\frac{D}{2}} & \sqrt{-\frac{D}{2}} \\
\sqrt{-\frac{D}{2}} & \sqrt{\frac{D}{2}} \\
\end{bmatrix}
\right) = D $$
But I can't join the 2 formulas...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are infinitely many ways. You could write

\begin{pmatrix}T & D \\ -1 & 0\end{pmatrix}
for example. Or you could try

\begin{pmatrix}\frac{T}{2} & \frac{T}{2} + \sqrt D \\ \frac{T}{2} - \sqrt D & \frac{T}{2}\end{pmatrix}
Since ##T## and ##D## are the only invariants, these matrices ought to be similar. Maybe you can work out the similarity transformation.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
There are infinitely many ways. You could write

\begin{pmatrix}T & D \\ -1 & 0\end{pmatrix}
for example. Or you could try

\begin{pmatrix}\frac{T}{2} & \frac{T}{2} + \sqrt D \\ \frac{T}{2} - \sqrt D & \frac{T}{2}\end{pmatrix}
Since ##T## and ##D## are the only invariants, these matrices ought to be similar. Maybe you can work out the similarity transformation.

Yeah, yeah! The ideia is express a matrix in terms of the invariants, exist some general formula for this?
 
No.

4chars
 
Ben Niehoff said:
No.

4chars

what?
 
He's saying "no". But his reply needs to be at least 4-characters long (to prevent spam), hence the "4chars" at the end.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K