How's is it possible for us to harness fusion energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Fusion
Hypo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hallo everyone!

I'd like to understand why is it that the sun can produce fusion energy with less heat then the required heat in our current reactors?

Fusion reactors produce 100M/Degrees to produce a few minutes of fusion where the sun uses only 10M degrees and still produces fusion? Why is that?


Hows is it possibile for us to harness that energy? how will reactors be able to converte that to electricity or any form of energy?

Hyp,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hallo Hypo! :smile:
Hypo said:
… why is it that the sun can produce fusion energy with less heat then the required heat in our current reactors?

I think it's the containment problem …

the sun doesn't have any difficulty keeping the stuff in the reactor! :biggrin:
 
No, it's a rate problem. The sun takes 10 billion years to use its fuel, i.e. uses 10-10 of its fuel per year. For a fusion reactor, we'd like that number to be tens of percent.
 
With other numbers:
The sun releases about 40W/m^3 of fusion power in the core. The large volume of the sun gives a nice total amount of fusion power. However, for earth, it would mean that 1GWth would require ~25 million cubic meters of plasma. That is a cube with ~300m side length and impractical for power plants.

In addition, the sun has a very high pressure (due to gravity) inside - something which is not reproducible on earth. With the same temperature, the power output would be lower than the sun's by some orders of magnitude.
 
Hypo said:
Hallo everyone!

I'd like to understand why is it that the sun can produce fusion energy with less heat then the required heat in our current reactors?

Fusion reactors produce 100M/Degrees to produce a few minutes of fusion where the sun uses only 10M degrees and still produces fusion? Why is that?


The above answers are all good, however I would like to point out that it boils down to the fact that fusion doesn't start to occur at a specific temperature. Due to quantum effects there is an absolutely tiny chance of two hydrogen atoms fusing together at room temperature. The hotter you get the hydrogen the harder the two collide with one another, which increases the chance that fusion will occur. (Up to a certain point, at which the chance with start to drop again)

Hows is it possibile for us to harness that energy? how will reactors be able to converte that to electricity or any form of energy?

Hyp,

Well, first we have to be able to produce a sustained reaction or chain of pulsed reactions that produce more power than they consume. We have to use power to get the magnetic fields, electric currents, and other things that are required to contain and heat the plasma. So figuring out how to do this efficiently is how we achieve fusion power.

As to how we harness this power once we achieve a net gain, there are several options. The simplest is to simply let the neutrons from the reactions heat water and use the steam to power a turbine, like many power plants do today.

Another option, if we can get fusion to work for the particular type of fuel it requires, is to use the actual kinetic energy of the ions after fusion and convert it to electric energy. A moving charge generates a magnetic field and we can use it to slow these ions down and generate a voltage/current in the process.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top