Humidity and Lenses: What to Do When Too Much Dust in House

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Humidity Lenses
AI Thread Summary
High humidity can cause lenses and mirrors to absorb moisture, leading to visibility issues and potential damage. It's advised to place optical equipment in a dry area with protective caps off to allow thorough drying and prevent mold growth. Wiping lenses or mirrors is discouraged, as it can lead to scratches and further damage; instead, using cleaning kits with pressurized air is recommended for dust removal. A small amount of dust typically does not significantly impact optical performance. Proper care and maintenance are essential to preserve the integrity of optical equipment.
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
In my area, humidity is where it's at.

One of the problems I noticed when grabing my mirror (first time using it) to pack up was the fact that it soaked up enough water that I can't even see myself in it. This explains why it didn't work.

I DID NOT WIPE THE LENSES. I just put the protectors back on, and that's it.

What should I do? (Too much dust in house to let dry.)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm sorry I didn't notice your post before. Put your scope in a dry place with all protective caps off and let it dry out thoroughly. Damp surfaces allow molds to grow, and they can etch coatings on lenses and silvering on mirrors. Don't worry about a little dust on your objective - it has a far less damaging effect on optical performance than you might think. Good luck.
 
YEa...don't try to clean your mirrors by wiping them...i learned the hard way :(...if u must clean the dust off the sell cleaning kits with presurized spray cans...alittle dust doesn't affect performance anyways like turbo-1 said.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top