Huygens & non-orbital re-entry speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Huygens Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in atmospheric entry between the Huygens probe and Earth-based re-entry vehicles. Huygens, which was not in orbit, could theoretically have a slower descent without requiring extensive aerobraking, unlike vehicles that must decelerate from Mach 25 upon re-entry. The conversation also explores the hypothetical scenario of falling straight to Earth and the required height to reach Mach 25 due to gravitational acceleration. Participants consider the implications of escape velocity and the necessary conditions for a safe landing, including transitioning to gliding or parachuting at lower speeds. The calculations involve gravitational constants and the relationship between velocity and height, emphasizing the need for specific distance values rather than just velocity metrics. The discussion suggests that the drop height for achieving Mach 25 would be significant, and participants express a desire for more concrete numerical answers regarding these distances.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,816
So, I notice in the animations of Huygens, they seem to suggest the probe enters the atmosphere more or less vertically, as opposed to almost horizontally, as in the case of re-entry of Earth-based vehicles. While I grant the the animations are idealized, I thought that perhaps it might be possibly be doable.

Earth re-entry vehicles must decelerate from Mach25+, a velocity they needed to reach to reach in orbit in the first place. But Huygens was not in orbit, and theoretically could have made a relatively slow planetfall, thus it might not have need a huge aerobraking phase.

And then while watching another venerable science-fact show, Futurama, I saw Bender fall straight to Earth, and I thought to myself:

(self, I thought...)

How high above Earth would one have to start, to reach Mach 25 by the time one reached the outer atmosphere, if one were plunging straight down under gravity?

Or, alternately,

How high could one start from and still survive a direct, falling entry into the atmosphere? For this, we must assume some point in the descent when it can supposedly switch to conventional touchdown procedures, such as gliding or parachuting. I understand that Huygens was going about Mach 1.5 when it deployed its shute for a soft landing. We must aslo guess at the aerobraking effct of the atmosphere over only a hundred kilometres or so.

Any guesses?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The escape velocity is \sqrt {2} times the orbital velocity, so that is even more. I get V_escape for the Earth:

V_e = \sqrt {2 \mu /r} = \sqrt{\frac {2 \times 4E14} {6.3E6 }} =

11000 m/sec.

For Saturn \mu is much greater and there is an additional velocity coming from the trip from Earth so the approach velocity to the top of the atmosphere will be far higher.
There are some pretty smart guys in the astrodynamics threads who you can get a real education from. See https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=69
 
Last edited:
Um. Appreciate all the effort, but. Meaningful answers to my questions would be distance values, not velocity values.
 
I have a formula:
(V^2)/2=GM (1/r1 - 1/r2)
Let GM be the constant for the Earth.
r1 is the height of the top of the atmosphere from the center of the Earth.
r2 is the drop height.
If R2 was infinite then V would be about 25000 mph. (the excape velocity)
Mach 25 I guess is 800 mph X 25 = 20000 mph.
So your drop height would be a pretty good distance out.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top