Hydrogen - The Mysterious Anomaly

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJRed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    anomaly hydrogen
AJRed
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been wondering what is up with hydrogen. It shares little more than basic commonality with any other atom, this strikes me as strange as all atoms share some properties with those around them on the periodic table whether be it nuclear, physical, or chemical. I asked a reputable source and she attributed it to the fact that Hydrogen is little more than a proton, but then deuterium or tritium should change dramatically given the addition of the neutrons that make the difference between Hydrogen and other atoms.

Does anyone have any explanation as to what makes Hydrogen so different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly is so different about hydrogen than the other atoms?

Zz.
 
AJRed said:
I've been wondering what is up with hydrogen. It shares little more than basic commonality with any other atom, this strikes me as strange as all atoms share some properties with those around them on the periodic table whether be it nuclear, physical, or chemical. I asked a reputable source and she attributed it to the fact that Hydrogen is little more than a proton, but then deuterium or tritium should change dramatically given the addition of the neutrons that make the difference between Hydrogen and other atoms.

Does anyone have any explanation as to what makes Hydrogen so different?
As far as chemical properties are concerned, H1, H2, and H3 are similar.
Many nuclides have unusual properties, not just H1.
 
AJRed said:
I asked a reputable source and she attributed it to the fact that Hydrogen is little more than a proton, but then deuterium or tritium should change dramatically given the addition of the neutrons that make the difference between Hydrogen and other atoms.

Does anyone have any explanation as to what makes Hydrogen so different?

How should the isotopes of hydrogen 'change dramatically'? This is a rather vague statement.
 
AJRed said:
I asked a reputable source and she attributed it to the fact that Hydrogen is little more than a proton, but then deuterium or tritium should change dramatically given the addition of the neutrons that make the difference between Hydrogen and other atoms.

The neutrons are not what make the difference between different elements in terms of chemical properties. It is the protons that do this. If you look at other elements, all the different isotopes have the same chemical properties. Hydrogen is no different.
 
I don't think this is what the OP is asking, but it's worth noting for those that claim that there can be no effect of neutron number on chemistry that there is some scope for isotopes to change the chemistry - in the kinetics of the system.

It's easy to see in the harmonic oscillator analogy - if you change the weight of the ball on the spring, the behaviour changes.

This is actually most obvious for isotopes of hydrogen. Moving from hydrogen to deuterium doubles the mass of the atom, tritium triples it. This is why there are some investigations into replacing hydrogen with deuterium for drugs (although it is difficult patent-wise). See: [URL]http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090316/full/458269a.html

http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090316/full/458269a.html[/URL] [PLAIN]http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jm4007998

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jm4007998[/URL][/URL]

I didn't know this until I had to do some work with deuterium last year. I think this is super neat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top