Hyperbolic Triangles: Deriving Relationships Algebraically or Geometrically

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter electricspit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic Triangles
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
electricspit
Messages
66
Reaction score
4
Hello, I'm going through Landau and Lifshitz "The Classical Theory of Fields" this summer with a friend and in section 4 I've come to a bit of a math problem.

Assume you have an inertial frame [itex]K'[/itex] moving at speed [itex]V[/itex] relative to an inertial frame [itex]K[/itex] in the [itex]x[/itex]-direction. In order for invariant intervals we require:

[itex] (ct)^2 - x^2 = (ct')^2 - (x')^2[/itex]

For this to be true:

[itex] x = x'\cosh{\Psi}+ct'\sinh{\Psi}[/itex]
[itex] ct=x'\sinh{\Psi}+ct'\cosh{\Psi}[/itex]

Where [itex]\Psi[/itex] is the angle of rotation in the [itex]xt[/itex] plane. Which makes sense. Now if we just look at the origin of the [itex]K'[/itex] frame moving these can be reduced to:

[itex] x=ct'\sinh{\Psi}[/itex]
[itex] ct=ct'\cosh{\Psi}[/itex]

and dividing the equations yields:

[itex] \tanh{\Psi}=\frac{x}{ct}[/itex]

But the speed [itex]V[/itex] is given by [itex]V=\frac{x}{t}[/itex] so:

[itex] \tanh{\Psi}=\frac{V}{c}[/itex]

The next part is what is a bit confusing. If this were regular trigonometry to find both [itex]\sin{\Psi}[/itex] and [itex]\cos{\Psi}[/itex] would just require the construction of a triangle. In this case however, they end up with very, very similar results except where the hypoteneuse would be they end up with something like this:

[itex] \sinh{\Psi}=\frac{\frac{V}{c}}{\sqrt{1-({\frac{V}{c}})^2}}[/itex]
[itex] \cosh{\Psi}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-({\frac{V}{c}})^2}}[/itex]

If anyone can point me in the right direction of deriving these relationships either algebraically or using geometry that would be extremely helpful!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
electricspit said:
Hello, I'm going through Landau and Lifshitz "The Classical Theory of Fields" this summer with a friend and in section 4 I've come to a bit of a math problem.

Assume you have an inertial frame [itex]K'[/itex] moving at speed [itex]V[/itex] relative to an inertial frame [itex]K[/itex] in the [itex]x[/itex]-direction. In order for invariant intervals we require:

[itex] (ct)^2 - x^2 = (ct')^2 - (x')^2[/itex]

For this to be true:

[itex] x = x'\cosh{\Psi}+ct'\sinh{\Psi}[/itex]
[itex] ct=x'\sinh{\Psi}+ct'\cosh{\Psi}[/itex]

Where [itex]\Psi[/itex] is the angle of rotation in the [itex]xt[/itex] plane. Which makes sense. Now if we just look at the origin of the [itex]K'[/itex] frame moving these can be reduced to:

[itex] x=ct'\sinh{\Psi}[/itex]
[itex] ct=ct'\cosh{\Psi}[/itex]

and dividing the equations yields:

[itex] \tanh{\Psi}=\frac{x}{ct}[/itex]

But the speed [itex]V[/itex] is given by [itex]V=\frac{x}{t}[/itex] so:

[itex] \tanh{\Psi}=\frac{V}{c}[/itex]

The next part is what is a bit confusing. If this were regular trigonometry to find both [itex]\sin{\Psi}[/itex] and [itex]\cos{\Psi}[/itex] would just require the construction of a triangle. In this case however, they end up with very, very similar results except where the hypoteneuse would be they end up with something like this:

[itex] \sinh{\Psi}=\frac{\frac{V}{c}}{\sqrt{1-{\frac{V}{c}}^2}}[/itex]
[itex] \cosh{\Psi}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-{\frac{V}{c}}^2}}[/itex]

If anyone can point me in the right direction of deriving these relationships either algebraically or using geometry that would be extremely helpful!

[tex]\sinh{\Psi}=\frac{\tanh{\Psi}}{\sqrt{1-\tanh^2{\Psi}}}[/tex]
[tex]\cosh{\Psi}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\tanh^2{\Psi}}}[/tex]
 
Okay hmm, assuming the Wikipedia section on "Comparison with circular functions" is correct then this is what I make of it all:

http://imgur.com/4eL9du1

Sorry for the mess, I've been working all day and am too tired to be perfect.