Geometry What are the best books to explore hyperbolic trigonometry?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on exploring hyperbolic functions beyond their use in calculus, with a focus on finding suitable literature for deeper understanding. Participants suggest various books, including "Hyperbolic Functions: With Configuration Theorems" and "Visual Complex Analysis" by Needham, which connects traditional and hyperbolic trigonometric functions through complex numbers. There's debate about whether the original poster (OP) is interested in hyperbolic geometry or just the hyperbolic functions themselves, with some recommending "Geometry" by Brannan for its self-contained chapter on hyperbolic geometry. The conversation highlights the connections between hyperbolic and traditional trigonometric functions, particularly the identity cosh² - sinh² = 1, which parallels the familiar trigonometric identity. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of context in understanding hyperbolic functions and geometry.
ciubba
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
My calc. 2 book more or less only mentioned the hyperbolic functions to make integration easier, so, now that I have some free time, I'd like to explore the area further. Could someone recommend a good book on the subject or do I need to take more math first?

A quick google search revealed "Hyperbolic Functions: With Configuration Theorems and Equivalent and Equidecomposable Figures," which sounds about what I'm looking for, but I can't find a preview of the book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
verty said:
This one would work: Van Brummelen - Introduction to Non-Euclidean Geometry. But I don't like this subject myself and wouldn't bother (I find it uninteresting, is all).

Why not learn spherical trig instead? Van Brummelen - Heavenly Matter, The Forgotten Art of Spherical Trigonometry.

Is that really what the OP wants? It was my impression he was only interested in learning a bit more about the cosh and sinh functions. I don't think it was his purpose to really do trigonometry on the hyperbolic plane. Nevertheless, if it was his purpose to learn this anyway, then I recommend Brannan: http://www.cambridge.org/be/academic/subjects/mathematics/geometry-and-topology/geometry-2nd-edition The chapter on hyperbolic geometry is mostly self-contained.

The book "Visual complex analysis" by Needhamhttp://[URL='https://www.amazon.com...omplex-Analysis-Tristan-Needham/dp/0198534469[/URL] gives the deep connections between the usual trig functions and the hyperbolic trig functions by using complex numbers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
micromass said:
Is that really what the OP wants? It was my impression he was only interested in learning a bit more about the cosh and sinh functions. I don't think it was his purpose to really do trigonometry on the hyperbolic plane. Nevertheless, if it was his purpose to learn this anyway, then I recommend Brannan: http://www.cambridge.org/be/academic/subjects/mathematics/geometry-and-topology/geometry-2nd-edition The chapter on hyperbolic geometry is mostly self-contained.

When he said "the area", I thought he meant hyperbolic geometry. I thought it piqued his interest that there might be a hyperbolic geometry and he wanted to know more about that. Because when I first saw sinh and cosh, what sprang to mind is, wow, there must be hyperbolic triangles, I want to know more. I did warn him off it as well, pointing out that I didn't think it was worth looking into.

The book "Visual complex analysis" by Needhamhttp://[URL='https://www.amazon.com...omplex-Analysis-Tristan-Needham/dp/0198534469[/URL] gives the deep connections between the usual trig functions and the hyperbolic trig functions by using complex numbers.

Hmm, I thought the connection was the formula cosh^2 - sinh^2 = 1 which is superficially very similar to cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 (this is honestly hand on my heart what I concluded when I first researched them some years ago), and that they are therefore useful for integration for the same reasons that the trig functions are useful. And perhaps this connection is enough for him in this direction as well, if he doesn't want to learn a whole lot of extra stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
11K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
3
Views
6K
Back
Top