Hypergeometic function. Questions.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Legendre polynomial defined as P_n(x) = _2F_1(-n, n+1; 1, (1-x)/2) and its relationship with Pochhammer symbols, specifically (a)_n = Γ(a+n)/Γ(a). It addresses the divergence of the Gamma function for negative integers and clarifies that while Γ diverges for negative integers, the ratio of Gamma functions evaluated at different integer arguments remains finite. The final expression derived shows that the ratio of Gamma functions can yield a finite result despite the divergence of individual terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Legendre polynomials and their properties
  • Familiarity with Pochhammer symbols and their definitions
  • Knowledge of the Gamma function and its behavior with negative integers
  • Basic grasp of hypergeometric functions and series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Legendre polynomials in mathematical physics
  • Explore the implications of Pochhammer symbols in combinatorial mathematics
  • Investigate the behavior of the Gamma function in complex analysis
  • Learn about hypergeometric functions and their role in solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or mathematical analysis, particularly those interested in special functions and their applications.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Legendre polynomial is defined as
##P_n(x)=_2F_1(-n,n+1;1,\frac{1-x}{2}) ##
Pochammer symbols are defined as ##(a)_n=\frac{\Gamma(a+n)}{\Gamma(a)}##. If I undestand well
[tex]P_n(x)=_2F_1(-n,n+1;1,\frac{1-x}{2}) =\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}\frac{(-n)_k(n+1)_k}{(1)_kk!}x^k[/tex]
I am not sure what happens with
[tex](-n)_k=\frac{\Gamma(-n+k)}{\Gamma(-n)}[/tex]
because ##\Gamma## diverge for negative integers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even though ## \Gamma ## diverges for negative integers, the ratio of gamma functions evaluated at different integer arguments does not necessarily diverge. First, note that ## \Gamma(n) = (n-1)! ##. Now write out the terms as follows:

## \frac{\Gamma(-n+k)}{\Gamma(-n)} = \frac{(k-n-1)!}{(-n-1)!} = \frac{(k-n-1)(k-n-2)\cdots (k-n-(k-1))(k-n-k)(k-n-(k+1))\cdots }{(-n-1)(-n-2)(-n-3)\cdots}.##

Therefore, we have

## \frac{\Gamma(-n+k)}{\Gamma(-n)} = \frac{(k-n-1)(k-n-2)\cdots (-n+1)(-n)(-n-1)\cdots }{(-n-1)(-n-2)(-n-3)\cdots} = (k-n-1)(k-n-2)\cdots(-n+1)(-n)##,

and this last result is finite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K