Hypothesis Test for Balanced Load on 6 I/O Channels - N = 150

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomJerry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
TomJerry
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Question : A computer system has 6 I/O channels and the system personnel are reasonably certain that the load on channels is balanced. If X is random variable denoting the index of the channel to which a given I/O operations is directed , that its pmf is assumed to be uniformly distributed. Out of N=150 I/O operation onserved, the number of operations directed to various channels were:
n0 = 22 ; n1 = 23 ; n2 = 29 ; n3 = 31 ; n4 = 26 ; n5 = 19

Test the hypothesis that the load on channels is balanced at 5 percent level of significance.

Solution
I have used the \chi2 = (O-E)2 / E

where O - obsevred and E is expected

Is this correct or should i be using some other method
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TomJerry said:
Question :

where O - obsevred and E is expected

Is this correct or should i be using some other method

You can use the chi square test \chi^2=\sum (O-E)^2/E Do you know how to get E?
 
Last edited:
SW VandeCarr said:
You can use the chi square test \chi^2=\sum (O-E)^2/E Do you know how to get E?

I have taken all the E = \Sigmaxi/6

Is that correct?
 
TomJerry said:
I have taken all the E = \Sigmaxi/6

Is that correct?

Yes. If each I/O is taken as equally probable, 150/6=25=E.
 
SW VandeCarr said:
Yes. If each I/O is taken as equally probable, 150/6=25=E.

Thanks
 
If you're being sarcastic, why did you ask for confirmation in the first place?
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top