Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Bell theorem without hypotheses?

  1. May 8, 2015 #1
    i found the following proof of Bell's theorem :

    we measure spin in 3 different directions a b c we can note the counting of events

    N1=n(a+,b+,c+)
    N2. + + -
    N3. + - +
    N4. + - -
    N5. - + +
    N6. - + -
    N7. - - +

    We have N3+n4<=n7+n3+n4+n2

    With n3+n4=p(+a,-b)
    N7+n3=p(-b,+c)
    N4+n2=p(+a,-c)

    It is violated by quantum mechanics but i don't see where the hypothesis of locality and reality comes into play.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 8, 2015 #2

    DrChinese

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The answer is that you can replicate the results with a classical system if either non-locality or non-realism are allowed. Surely, you could imagine non-local mechanisms that would allow 2 particles to mimic each other in just the right amount to give quantum results.

    Harder to picture non-realism. But essentially you are assuming this when you have N1=a+, b+, c+ because you only ever measure 2 of these at a time at most.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Bell theorem without hypotheses?
  1. Bell's theorem (Replies: 264)

Loading...