Hypothesis Test: Mean Content of Containers ≥ 3L

  • Thread starter Thread starter princejan7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the hypothesis test concerning the mean content of containers, specifically whether it is at least 3 liters. The null hypothesis (H0) is proposed as the mean not being at least 3 liters, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) is that the mean is at least 3 liters. There is confusion regarding the formulation of the null hypothesis, with some participants arguing that it should contradict the claim. The conversation highlights a disagreement on the wording of the hypotheses and the principles of hypothesis testing. Clarity in hypothesis formulation is essential for accurate statistical analysis.
princejan7
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean content of all such containers is at least 3 litres?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




I'm not sure what H0 and H1 will be

H0: The mean content is not at least 3L

H1: The mean content is at least 3L. So does this imply that u, the mean, is greater than or equal to 3 or is u lower than or equal to 3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
princejan7 said:
H1: The mean content is at least 3L. So does this imply that u, the mean, is greater than or equal to 3 or is u lower than or equal to 3?
Which do you think?
 
haruspex said:
Which do you think?

The solution says that for Ho, u is greater than or equal to 3

isnt the null hypothesis supposed to be the opposite of the claim?
 
@ princejan7: Of the numbers 1,2,3,4,5, which ones would you say are at least 3?
 
That the stated answer has the null hypothesis as H_0 \colon \mu \ge 3, it is a very poorly worded question. Hypothesis testing does not gather data in support of the null hypothesis
 
statdad said:
That the stated answer has the null hypothesis as H_0 \colon \mu \ge 3, it is a very poorly worded question. Hypothesis testing does not gather data in support of the null hypothesis
I'd go further and say the stated answer is simply wrong.
 
haruspex said:
I'd go further and say the stated answer is simply wrong.

I was feeling unusually mellow when I made my comment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top