I Hypothetical Question About Particles & Movement

InfiniteEntity
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
I was watching videos on YouTube and this question suddenly popped into my head: If I was able to push a sub-atomic particle (proton, electron, etc...) a distance of 1 Planck length. Excluding all the quantum interactions and uncertainties, is it possible to measure/calculate how fast the particle would be going? Or how much time it takes for it to travel that distance?

I was thinking that it would travel at the speed of light, making it easy to determine the time taken, but I figured that since the particles are not of mass-less property, they cannot travel at the speed of light.

P.S I have a chemistry exam tomorrow and I'm thinking of this thing. Help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the velocity would just be the distance divided by the time taken to travel that distance. The Planck length is nothing special in this regard.
 
That's fine. But then, how would you really measure the time taken by the particle? Is there any sort of special equipment (if measurable) or equation (if calculable) needed other than just knowing or assuming the value?
 
InfiniteEntity said:
That's fine. But then, how would you really measure the time taken by the particle? Is there any sort of special equipment (if measurable) or equation (if calculable) needed other than just knowing or assuming the value?
The times and distances involved are much smaller than we can measure with our best available lab equipment, so it's possible (and good reasons to think it's likely) that some as not unknown physics will appear at that scale. But based on what we know so far, there's nothing special about the Planck length; it's just a distance like any other.
 
InfiniteEntity said:
Excluding all the quantum interactions and uncertainties

This sort of makes the problem completely trivial, because the Planck length is defined using quantum mechanics (and is expected to be important for quantum gravity). If you ignore the theory that makes it significant, then it is not significant, and you're just moving a particle by a particular length scale.
 
InfiniteEntity said:
P.S I have a chemistry exam tomorrow and I'm thinking of this thing. Help me.

Concentrate on the chemistry!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top