Fervent Freyja said:
The clerk isn't actually doing arithmetic when bringing the change back in that case. That is more rote and not much different than a very young child being able to count to 143. I honestly cannot see the logic in the way you guys are subtracting though.
.
A-B = C
10-3 = 7
10= 7+3
(customer's money that he gives to the cashier) - (worth of groceries that the cashier gives to customer) = (amount of change that the cashier gives to customer)
Of course if the customer exchanges equal value of money, for equal value of groceries, then the amount of change received equals zero.
When purchasing 3 dollars worth of bread. I use 3 x 1 dollar bills to exchange those to the bread. Then I receive the bread in exchange for the money. No change is required.
Or alternative point of view for grocery purchase.
3,5 $ + X$ = 5$
cashier's worth is on the left side, and the customer's worth is on the right side.
cashier's worth = 3,5 dollars worth of groceries + X amount of change
1.the worth has to be equal on both sides. The trade is an equal and fair trade. Neither party is indebted to the other.
2.Then the items are exchanged. Customer takes groceries and change, and the cashier takes the money such as 5 dollar bill
3. transaction is complete.
You do take the groceries and the change in dollars home, don't you? The whole purpose of being at the grocery store is to exchange value of products, to the value of money that you carry with you. You don't take only the money home with you. You do take the products AND the money.
I suppose that's the idea of the addition technique in the end.Now in some instance the customer could possibly reject getting change money from the cashier. In this case the customer would overpay the actual value of the product, but he would do so willingly to avoid greater trouble...
you are in a train and you need to get to a job interview. But you don't have enough small cash on your person to purchase a train ticket. You should probably pay the train ticket inspector with 50€ bill, even though you will likely lose money, because you will not get enough change from the ticket inspector. But if you want to get to that job interview in time, you would probably "overpay" the value of the train ticket. If you don't purchase that train ticket, then I think it is possible the police detain you, and you will likely miss the job interview etc... You would also get probably 80€ penalty fare + the actual price of the ticket, to require payment on your behalf. And you would be evicted from the train at the next train stop, and you would have to wait for the next train. To avoid that hassle, you could overpay the value of the ticket with 50€ bill, but likely you will get much less change together with the train ticket. But if you feel strongly about the job opportunity, you would most likely do that kind of transaction.
I've never actually had to try that myself, but I suppose that's how it would work in my country. The penalty fare for riding train without ticket is 80€ and the price of ticket is something like 3,2€ for adult. (for short fares only). The minimum size bill that you receive from the ATM is 20€. So, I reckon that sometimes even those small 20€ bills would be too much