I can't figure this one out thermal expansion of rod and ruler

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of linear expansion for a rod when subjected to temperature changes. Initially, the rod measures 20.01 cm at 19°C and expands to 20.18 cm at 219°C. The user incorrectly calculates the coefficient of linear expansion, initially arriving at a value of 3.140965e-5, which is identified as incorrect due to measurement discrepancies between the rod and the steel ruler. The user is advised to reconsider the effects of thermal expansion on both the rod and the ruler to achieve accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal expansion concepts
  • Familiarity with the coefficient of linear expansion
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Knowledge of temperature conversion and measurement techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formula for linear expansion: ΔL = L0 * α * ΔT
  • Learn about the coefficient of linear expansion for various materials
  • Explore measurement techniques to minimize errors in thermal expansion experiments
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on measurement tools, specifically rulers
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics and material properties, as well as educators looking for practical examples of thermal expansion calculations.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



At 19°C, a rod is exactly 20.01 cm long on a steel ruler. Both the rod and the ruler are placed in an oven at 219°C, where the rod now measures 20.18 cm on the same ruler. What is the coefficient of linear expansion for the material of which the rod is made?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The ruler is "normally" 20.01 cm.
Using the coefficient of thermal expansion for steel, I know that the oven caused it to lengthen to 20.054022 cm.

That means that the new ruler's inches are 1.0022 times longer than the "old ruler."

The rod measures 20.18 cm on the "new ruler," and since 20.18/1.0022 = 20.13570146, that's what the rod would have measured on the "old ruler."

Therefore the change in length of the rod is 20.1357 - 20.01 = .1257.

Therefore the rod material coefficient is

.1257 / (20.01)(200) = 3.140965e-5

This is wrong, and I've worked a few of them and my answers always seem to be off by a predictable amount (slightly more than half of the correct answer). What's going wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think over the measurement with new ruler and old ruler.

You measure the length of a rod L with a ruler of inch scale.
You get that the rod is L=8 units long. One unit is 2.5 cm on your ruler. What is the length of the rod measured with a cm-scale ruler?

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K