So I am trying to follow my professors notes. Here is my work on the proof. And on the bottom is my answer and his answer. I know my answer is wrong, as I do not fully understand how to convert the summations at the end to their vector quantities. Is my work incorrect?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[PLAIN]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/6175/questionn.gif [Broken]

I do not even know what F times nabla means. I know nabla times F is divergence. Are they the same????

EDIT: Oh and his G is my q.

AND his answer has a -(G*Nabla)*F at the end.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I do not understand this vector identity proof

Loading...

Similar Threads - understand vector identity | Date |
---|---|

B Need some help with understanding linear approximations | Feb 17, 2018 |

I Understanding an integral | Jan 31, 2018 |

I Help with understanding inexact differential | Nov 13, 2017 |

Understanding vector calculus proofs | Oct 1, 2011 |

Trouble understanding method to compute unit normal vector for a parametric curve | Jun 1, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**